From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753277AbcAGUe3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Jan 2016 15:34:29 -0500 Received: from mail-yk0-f173.google.com ([209.85.160.173]:36406 "EHLO mail-yk0-f173.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751534AbcAGUe0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Jan 2016 15:34:26 -0500 Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2016 15:34:25 -0500 From: Tejun Heo To: Parav Pandit Cc: cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, lizefan@huawei.com, Johannes Weiner , Doug Ledford , Liran Liss , "Hefty, Sean" , Jason Gunthorpe , Haggai Eran , Jonathan Corbet , james.l.morris@oracle.com, serge@hallyn.com, Or Gerlitz , Matan Barak , raindel@mellanox.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCHv1 0/6] rdma controller support Message-ID: <20160107203425.GG1898@mtj.duckdns.org> References: <1452020286-9508-1-git-send-email-pandit.parav@gmail.com> <20160105215623.GH5995@mtj.duckdns.org> <20160107150718.GC29797@mtj.duckdns.org> <20160107200604.GE1898@mtj.duckdns.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 02:02:20AM +0530, Parav Pandit wrote: > o.k. That doable. I want to make sure that we are on same page on below design. > rpool (which will contain static array based on header file ) would be > still there, because resource limits are on per device basis. Number > of devices are variable and dynamically appear. Therefore rdma_cg will > have the list of rpool attached to it. Do you agree? Yeap. Would it make more sense to hang them off of whatever struct which presents a rdma device tho? And then just walk them from cgroup controller? Thanks. -- tejun