From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1753637AbcAGVH5 (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Thu, 7 Jan 2016 16:07:57 -0500
Received: from mail-yk0-f182.google.com ([209.85.160.182]:36368 "EHLO
	mail-yk0-f182.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1752283AbcAGVHy (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 7 Jan 2016 16:07:54 -0500
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2016 16:07:52 -0500
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Parav Pandit <pandit.parav@gmail.com>
Cc: cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
        lizefan@huawei.com, Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
        Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>, Liran Liss <liranl@mellanox.com>,
        "Hefty, Sean" <sean.hefty@intel.com>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com>,
        Haggai Eran <haggaie@mellanox.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
        james.l.morris@oracle.com, serge@hallyn.com,
        Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@mellanox.com>, Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com>,
        raindel@mellanox.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
        linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv1 0/6] rdma controller support
Message-ID: <20160107210752.GK1898@mtj.duckdns.org>
References: <CAG53R5XQaUz=vJCEqLwGt93CC1YMnVQ=k4DuRU0nspcb_-+_6g@mail.gmail.com>
 <20160107150718.GC29797@mtj.duckdns.org>
 <CAG53R5WwdRwb0XyAMGMey4JaDGUntJ9=m_ZToFkygboZxfMQ6A@mail.gmail.com>
 <20160107200604.GE1898@mtj.duckdns.org>
 <CAG53R5Xy8avVVvfGjgYOJSVRNFOHpiHXrQeEeb41EP4hy370QQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20160107203425.GG1898@mtj.duckdns.org>
 <CAG53R5V80hY2SLrt3-GNeQ-wr+0aFM7sNJLvUGuy70t5dc8yOA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20160107204921.GI1898@mtj.duckdns.org>
 <20160107205042.GJ1898@mtj.duckdns.org>
 <CAG53R5WVJoO1Dd9vJ+zeiskQsttSbOpW+uyfay-oJFELd-FK2Q@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAG53R5WVJoO1Dd9vJ+zeiskQsttSbOpW+uyfay-oJFELd-FK2Q@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 02:31:26AM +0530, Parav Pandit wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 2:20 AM, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> wrote:
> > Ooh, btw, please don't bother to create separate interfaces for v1 and
> > v2 hierarchies.  Just creating one following v2 conventions and using
> > the same thing for v1 should do and is a lot easier for everybody.
> >
> Sure. I have already made that change to remove list.
> and changed rdma.resource.verb.limit to rdma.verb.max etc.
> 
> I will keep rdma.hw.max around until we get some consensus.
> 
> Alternatively I was thinking to merge that as another attribute in
> rdma.max file, like
> 
> mlx4_0 verb ah=max pd=10 qp=10
> mlx4_0 hw ah=10 pd=100
> ocrdma hw ah=10 pd=100
> 
> This remove hw specific extra file for rare feature.

Hmm... if there are duplicate keys, I think rdma.verb.max and
rdma.hw.max would be cleaner.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun