From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756643AbcAIXLl (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Jan 2016 18:11:41 -0500 Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk ([195.92.253.2]:51382 "EHLO ZenIV.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756247AbcAIXLk (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Jan 2016 18:11:40 -0500 Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2016 23:11:38 +0000 From: Al Viro To: One Thousand Gnomes Cc: Joshua Hudson , linux-kernel Subject: Re: [PATCH] add support for larger files in minix filesystem Message-ID: <20160109231138.GF17997@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <20160109033712.GA5955@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20160109213720.52b2740e@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160109213720.52b2740e@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Jan 09, 2016 at 09:37:20PM +0000, One Thousand Gnomes wrote: > If your physical media does not suffer from needing to keep blocks on the > same disk cylinder (ie rotating rust) then the V7 file system is even > smaller than the Minix one but also has the 2GB limit. Keep in mind that v7 support comes along with sysvfs one, so the module is quite likely bigger than in case of minixfs...