From: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
To: linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org, dhowells@redhat.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH parisc,frv,m68k] timerfd: Fix timeout values with CONFIG_TIME_LOW_RES=y
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2016 21:57:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160110205739.GA21713@p100.box> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160104222757.GA969@p100.box>
On architectures where CONFIG_TIME_LOW_RES is set (currently parisc,
m68k, frv) calling timerfd_settime() to set a timeout and directly
afterwards calling timerfd_gettime() to get the remaining time shows a
behaviour that the remaining time can be higher than the originally set
timeout.
Here is an example showing the problem, that the nsec value of it_value
is higher than the set nsec value:
timerfd_settime: interval (sec=0, nsec=100000000) it_value (sec=0, nsec=100000000)
timerfd_gettime: interval (sec=0, nsec=100000000) it_value (sec=0, nsec=103029949)
This happens because in hrtimer_start_range_ns() the expiry time is
rounded to the next jiffies period to avoid short timeouts. When running
with HZ=250 this is 4ms which can be seen in the example above.
This behaviour confuses userspace programs. For example, the debian
liblinux-fd-perl and libnanomsg-raw-perl packges fail to build because
the timeout is higher than expected.
Fix this problem by subtracting the value added by
hrtimer_start_range_ns() before returning the timeout back to userspace.
Signed-off-by: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
diff --git a/fs/timerfd.c b/fs/timerfd.c
index b94fa6c..098ac0a 100644
--- a/fs/timerfd.c
+++ b/fs/timerfd.c
@@ -152,8 +152,17 @@ static ktime_t timerfd_get_remaining(struct timerfd_ctx *ctx)
if (isalarm(ctx))
remaining = alarm_expires_remaining(&ctx->t.alarm);
- else
+ else {
remaining = hrtimer_expires_remaining(&ctx->t.tmr);
+#ifdef CONFIG_TIME_LOW_RES
+ /* Expiry time was rounded up in hrtimer_start_range_ns()
+ * to the next jiffies period to avoid short timeouts.
+ * Subtract it here again to avoid userspace seeing higher
+ * values than originally programmed. */
+ if (!(ctx->settime_flags & TFD_TIMER_ABSTIME))
+ remaining.tv64 -= hrtimer_resolution;
+#endif
+ }
return remaining.tv64 < 0 ? ktime_set(0, 0): remaining;
}
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-10 20:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-26 12:26 timerfd_settime/timerfd_gettime issue ? Helge Deller
2015-12-29 9:44 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-12-29 20:13 ` Helge Deller
2015-12-30 9:57 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-01-04 22:27 ` Helge Deller
2016-01-10 20:57 ` Helge Deller [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160110205739.GA21713@p100.box \
--to=deller@gmx.de \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox