linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@infradead.org>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] perf: Sanitize perf directory structure, p1
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 13:39:44 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160111123944.GA13637@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1450814151-21945-1-git-send-email-bp@alien8.de>


* Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> wrote:

> From: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
> 
> Hi guys,
> 
> so what better time to do that fun than during the holidays when no one
> else is producing patches. :-)
> 
> Anyway, here's a part one conversion of the AMD perf events facilities.
> Directory structure looks like this:
> 
> arch/x86/events/
> |-- amd
> |   |-- core.c
> |   |-- ibs.c
> |   |-- iommu.c
> |   |-- iommu.h
> |   `-- uncore.c
> |-- core.c
> `-- Makefile
> 
> and I've kept the churn at a mininum. Holler if something's not kosher.

So it is only now that I noticed that we have both 'core.c' and 'uncore.c', which 
is slightly bit confusing: the core.c's we have around the kernel denote core 
subsystem functionality - not CPU core functionality. If we have uncore.c around, 
confusion might ensue.

OTOH maybe it's not a big issue and we can just live with it. I'd hate to see 
main.c. Maybe rename 'uncore.c' to 'cpu_uncore.c'? OTOH that sounds a bit silly 
too. So maybe leave it as you named them.

Thanks,

	Ingo

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-01-11 12:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-12-22 19:55 [RFC PATCH 0/5] perf: Sanitize perf directory structure, p1 Borislav Petkov
2015-12-22 19:55 ` [RFC PATCH 1/5] x86/events: Move perf_event.c Borislav Petkov
2015-12-22 19:55 ` [RFC PATCH 2/5] x86/events: Move perf_event_amd.c Borislav Petkov
2015-12-22 19:55 ` [RFC PATCH 3/5] x86/events: Move perf_event_amd_ibs.c Borislav Petkov
2015-12-22 19:55 ` [RFC PATCH 4/5] x86/events: Move perf_event_amd_iommu.* Borislav Petkov
2015-12-28 15:50   ` Joerg Roedel
2015-12-29  8:50     ` Boris Petkov
2015-12-22 19:55 ` [RFC PATCH 5/5] x86/events: Move perf_event_amd_uncore.c Borislav Petkov
2016-01-11 12:39 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2016-01-11 14:34   ` [RFC PATCH 0/5] perf: Sanitize perf directory structure, p1 Borislav Petkov
2016-01-11 15:14     ` Ingo Molnar
2016-01-11 16:32       ` Borislav Petkov
2016-01-12 11:16         ` Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160111123944.GA13637@gmail.com \
    --to=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=acme@infradead.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).