From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1761630AbcALQKj (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Tue, 12 Jan 2016 11:10:39 -0500
Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([78.46.96.112]:49197 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1753205AbcALQKh (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 12 Jan 2016 11:10:37 -0500
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 17:10:24 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, x86@kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, live-patching@vger.kernel.org,
        Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>, Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>,
        Bernd Petrovitsch <bernd@petrovitsch.priv.at>,
        Chris J Arges <chris.j.arges@canonical.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 06/25] x86/stacktool: Compile-time stack metadata
 validation
Message-ID: <20160112161024.GE30558@pd.tnic>
References: <cover.1450442274.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com>
 <ca128e3391e1f32fe5a9a92590d179d4dbad856c.1450442274.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com>
 <20160112144829.GC22699@pd.tnic>
 <20160112150639.GC310@treble.redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20160112150639.GC310@treble.redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 09:06:39AM -0600, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> This file is a straight copy from the kernel arch/x86/include/asm/insn.h
> file, and there's even a Makefile target which warns if there are any
> differences between the two.  I figured it's such a minor issue that it
> wasn't worth the churn to fix both files.

That target could surely learn to ignore comments, I guess. You could
also kill that address in both files later, ontop, when you feel bored. :)

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.