From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932900AbcAMTQk (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jan 2016 14:16:40 -0500 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([78.46.96.112]:52734 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932802AbcAMTQi (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jan 2016 14:16:38 -0500 Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 20:16:22 +0100 From: Borislav Petkov To: Jacob Pan Cc: Thomas Gleixner , LKML , Linux PM , Rafael Wysocki , "H. Peter Anvin" , Ingo Molnar , X86 Kernel , Srinivas Pandruvada , Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] powercap/rapl: reduce ipi calls Message-ID: <20160113191622.GP12897@pd.tnic> References: <1452647483-14244-1-git-send-email-jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com> <1452647483-14244-3-git-send-email-jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com> <20160113082113.3314fa92@icelake> <20160113163610.GH12897@pd.tnic> <20160113095124.186ff487@yairi> <20160113180412.GN12897@pd.tnic> <20160113102138.4e34e890@yairi> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160113102138.4e34e890@yairi> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 10:21:38AM -0800, Jacob Pan wrote: > static int cpufreq_p4_setdc(unsigned int cpu, unsigned int newstate) > { > ... > > rdmsr_on_cpu(cpu, MSR_IA32_THERM_CONTROL, &l, &h); > if (newstate == DC_DISABLE) { > pr_debug("CPU#%d disabling modulation\n", cpu); > wrmsr_on_cpu(cpu, MSR_IA32_THERM_CONTROL, l & ~(1<<4), > h); } else { > pr_debug("CPU#%d setting duty cycle to %d%%\n", > cpu, ((125 * newstate) / 10)); > /* bits 63 - 5 : reserved > * bit 4 : enable/disable > * bits 3-1 : duty cycle > * bit 0 : reserved > */ > l = (l & ~14); > l = l | (1<<4) | ((newstate & 0x7)<<1); > wrmsr_on_cpu(cpu, MSR_IA32_THERM_CONTROL, l, h); > } This cannot be converted because you need to do the stuff between the rdmsr_on_cpu() and wrmsr_on_cpu() calls. > static int sfi_cpufreq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned > int index) { > ... > > rdmsr_on_cpu(policy->cpu, MSR_IA32_PERF_CTL, &lo, &hi); > lo = (lo & ~INTEL_PERF_CTL_MASK) | > ((u32) sfi_cpufreq_array[next_perf_state].ctrl_val & > INTEL_PERF_CTL_MASK); > wrmsr_on_cpu(policy->cpu, MSR_IA32_PERF_CTL, lo, hi); Ditto. These two examples prove my point, actually. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.