From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>
Cc: acme@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pi3orama@163.com,
lizefan@huawei.com, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/9] perf build: Test correct path of perf in build-test
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 11:03:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160114100346.GC31454@krava.brq.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1452687442-6186-4-git-send-email-wangnan0@huawei.com>
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 12:17:16PM +0000, Wang Nan wrote:
> If an 'O' is passed to 'make build-test', many 'test -x' and 'test -f'
> will fail because perf resides in a different directory. Fix this by
> computing PERF_OUT according to 'O' and test correct output files.
> For make_kernelsrc and make_kernelsrc_tools, set KBUILD_OUTPUT_DIR
> instead because the path is different from others ($(O)/perf vs
> $(O)/tools/perf).
>
> Signed-off-by: Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>
> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
> ---
> tools/perf/tests/make | 23 +++++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/make b/tools/perf/tests/make
> index 14d7b8d..1e59ce8 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/tests/make
> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/make
> @@ -13,10 +13,12 @@ else
> endif
> else
> PERF := .
> +PERF_OUT := $(PERF)
> O_OPT :=
>
> ifneq ($(O),)
> FULL_O := $(shell readlink -f $(O) || echo $(O))
> + PERF_OUT := $(FULL_O)
> ifeq ($(SET_O),1)
> O_OPT := 'O=$(FULL_O)'
> endif
> @@ -173,11 +175,11 @@ test_make_doc := $(test_ok)
> test_make_help_O := $(test_ok)
> test_make_doc_O := $(test_ok)
>
> -test_make_python_perf_so := test -f $(PERF)/python/perf.so
> +test_make_python_perf_so := test -f $(PERF_OUT)/python/perf.so
>
> -test_make_perf_o := test -f $(PERF)/perf.o
> -test_make_util_map_o := test -f $(PERF)/util/map.o
> -test_make_util_pmu_bison_o := test -f $(PERF)/util/pmu-bison.o
> +test_make_perf_o := test -f $(PERF_OUT)/perf.o
> +test_make_util_map_o := test -f $(PERF_OUT)/util/map.o
> +test_make_util_pmu_bison_o := test -f $(PERF_OUT)/util/pmu-bison.o
>
> define test_dest_files
> for file in $(1); do \
> @@ -244,7 +246,7 @@ test_make_perf_o_O := test -f $$TMP_O/perf.o
> test_make_util_map_o_O := test -f $$TMP_O/util/map.o
> test_make_util_pmu_bison_o_O := test -f $$TMP_O/util/pmu-bison.o
>
> -test_default = test -x $(PERF)/perf
> +test_default = test -x $(PERF_OUT)/perf
> test = $(if $(test_$1),$(test_$1),$(test_default))
>
> test_default_O = test -x $$TMP_O/perf
> @@ -264,7 +266,7 @@ endif
>
> MAKEFLAGS := --no-print-directory
>
> -clean := @(cd $(PERF); make -s -f $(MK) clean >/dev/null)
> +clean := @(cd $(PERF); make -s -f $(MK) O=$(PERF_OUT) clean >/dev/null; make -s -f $(MK) clean >/dev/null)
>
> $(run):
> $(call clean)
> @@ -293,17 +295,22 @@ tarpkg:
> ( eval $$cmd ) >> $@ 2>&1 && \
> rm -f $@
>
> +KBUILD_OUTPUT_DIR := ../..
> +ifneq ($(O),)
> + KBUILD_OUTPUT_DIR := $(O)
> +endif
hum, why kbuild? BUILD_O, KERNELSRC_O ... ?
thanks,
jirka
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-14 10:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-13 12:17 [PATCH 0/9] perf build: Make build-test faster Wang Nan
2016-01-13 12:17 ` [PATCH 1/9] perf build: Set parallel making options build-test Wang Nan
2016-01-19 13:34 ` [tip:perf/urgent] " tip-bot for Wang Nan
2016-01-13 12:17 ` [PATCH 2/9] perf build: Pass O option to Makefile.perf in build-test Wang Nan
2016-01-14 9:32 ` Jiri Olsa
2016-01-14 9:56 ` Wangnan (F)
2016-01-14 14:28 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-01-14 14:37 ` Jiri Olsa
2016-01-14 14:42 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-01-14 15:20 ` pi3orama
2016-01-13 12:17 ` [PATCH 3/9] perf build: Test correct path of perf " Wang Nan
2016-01-14 9:56 ` Jiri Olsa
2016-01-14 9:57 ` Jiri Olsa
2016-01-14 9:59 ` Wangnan (F)
2016-01-14 10:03 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2016-01-14 10:04 ` Jiri Olsa
2016-01-14 10:14 ` Wangnan (F)
2016-01-13 12:17 ` [PATCH 4/9] perf build: Pass O option to kernel makefile " Wang Nan
2016-01-13 12:17 ` [PATCH 5/9] perf build: Add feature-dump target Wang Nan
2016-01-13 12:17 ` [PATCH 6/9] perf build: Introduce FEATURES_DUMP make variable Wang Nan
2016-01-13 12:17 ` [PATCH 7/9] tools build: Allow subprojects select all feature checkers Wang Nan
2016-01-13 12:17 ` [PATCH 8/9] perf build: Select all feature checkers for feature-dump Wang Nan
2016-01-14 10:18 ` Jiri Olsa
2016-01-13 12:17 ` [PATCH 9/9] perf build: Use feature dump file for build-test Wang Nan
2016-01-14 10:19 ` Jiri Olsa
2016-01-14 10:24 ` Wangnan (F)
2016-01-14 12:44 ` Jiri Olsa
2016-01-14 10:23 ` Jiri Olsa
2016-01-14 1:54 ` [PATCH 0/9] perf build: Make build-test faster Wangnan (F)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160114100346.GC31454@krava.brq.redhat.com \
--to=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizefan@huawei.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=pi3orama@163.com \
--cc=wangnan0@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox