From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756213AbcANPcP (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Jan 2016 10:32:15 -0500 Received: from mail-wm0-f53.google.com ([74.125.82.53]:33254 "EHLO mail-wm0-f53.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754011AbcANPcL (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Jan 2016 10:32:11 -0500 Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 15:32:06 +0000 From: Lee Jones To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] MFD for v4.4 Message-ID: <20160114153206.GD28745@x1> References: <20160114091913.GA28745@x1> <20160115011106.43b0caf9@canb.auug.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20160115011106.43b0caf9@canb.auug.org.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 15 Jan 2016, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Lee, > > On Thu, 14 Jan 2016 09:19:13 +0000 Lee Jones wrote: > > > > Some of the patches in this set haven't had as long of a -next > > soak-test as I normally like. This is due to a combination of > > me taking a vacation from -rc4 and unusually short -rc releases > > during the v4.4 cycle. > > > > I'm keen not to let down contributors so I am sending the pull- > > request out in the full knowledge that a snot-o-gram might well > > be winging it's way to me in receipt. I have taken due care to > > thoroughly build test the set as much as possible, but if there > > are any issues I'll take the time to provide reason and > > apologise in advance now. > > > > The following changes since commit 1ec218373b8ebda821aec00bb156a9c94fad9cd4: > > > > Linux 4.4-rc2 (2015-11-22 16:45:59 -0800) > > > > are available in the git repository at: > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lee/mfd.git tags/mfd-for-linus-4.5 > > This contains 30 commits (of 58) that have been rewritten since being > added to linux-next. The patches appear to be identical. That's right, I have changed some of the commit messages. Do you see a problem? -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog