From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Sebastian Reichel <sre@kernel.org>
Cc: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
ivo.g.dimitrov.75@gmail.com, aaro.koskinen@iki.fi,
Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
nsekhar@ti.com, khilman@kernel.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>,
pavel@ucw.cz, pali.rohar@gmail.com, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
patrikbachan@gmail.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: host: omap_hsmmc: add a verbose print to enable CONFIG_REGULATOR_PBIAS
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 09:14:21 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160115091421.GD5783@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160114224025.GA26988@earth>
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 11:40:25PM +0100, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 05:25:49PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > There are very good reasons not to do this: that will result in
> > configurations where MMC_OMAP_HS was set but without REGULATOR_PBIAS
> > ending up with MMC_OMAP_HS being disabled. That doesn't help the
> > root problem, which is "why has the kernel boot regressed for my
> > previous working configuration?"
> >
> > The solution proposed here adds a message to the boot which points
> > out fair and square what needs to be done to rectify the boot
> > failure. Adding a dependency just brings up the question "where
> > has my MMC driver gone?"
>
> The best thing would be to have no regression. Just printing a
> message means I have to build another kernel. But more importantly
> the message may not be visible by the user - e.g. if the display has
> not yet been initialized.
I agree in principle, but that's not possible here (see Tony's mails
on why the PBIAS stuff needs to be optional.) I'd agree with changing
the Kconfig if PBIAS were a hard and fast requirement, but it isn't.
--
RMK's Patch system: http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-15 9:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-14 9:15 [PATCH] mmc: host: omap_hsmmc: add a verbose print to enable CONFIG_REGULATOR_PBIAS Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2016-01-14 12:07 ` Sebastian Reichel
2016-01-14 12:39 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2016-01-14 16:49 ` Tony Lindgren
2016-01-14 17:25 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2016-01-14 22:40 ` Sebastian Reichel
2016-01-15 9:14 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2016-01-15 16:02 ` Tony Lindgren
2016-01-27 14:15 ` Ulf Hansson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160115091421.GD5783@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=aaro.koskinen@iki.fi \
--cc=ivo.g.dimitrov.75@gmail.com \
--cc=khilman@kernel.org \
--cc=kishon@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=nsekhar@ti.com \
--cc=pali.rohar@gmail.com \
--cc=patrikbachan@gmail.com \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=sre@kernel.org \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).