From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964770AbcAOT1i (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Jan 2016 14:27:38 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.136]:45862 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752066AbcAOT1h (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Jan 2016 14:27:37 -0500 Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 16:27:33 -0300 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo To: Wang Nan Cc: jolsa@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pi3orama@163.com, lizefan@huawei.com, Jiri Olsa Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/9] perf build: Add feature-dump target Message-ID: <20160115192733.GG18367@kernel.org> References: <1452830421-77757-1-git-send-email-wangnan0@huawei.com> <1452830421-77757-6-git-send-email-wangnan0@huawei.com> <20160115191139.GE18367@kernel.org> <20160115192352.GF18367@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160115192352.GF18367@kernel.org> X-Url: http://acmel.wordpress.com User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Em Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 04:23:52PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu: > Nitpicking a bit: libbpf uses FEATURES_DUMP, i.e. plural, which I think > is the proper naming, as there are multiple features being detected and > thus dumped, would you mind if I chainsaw it all into consistency using > FEATURES-DUMP, FEATURES_DUMP, etc? Oh well, saw the next patch in this series, it then uses FEATURES_DUMP, will leave this for later when the whole series gets applied... - Arnaldo