public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: "Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
	"Grant Likely" <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
	"Linus Walleij" <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	"Thierry Reding" <treding@nvidia.com>,
	"Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] driver-core: platform: automatically mark wakeup devices
Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2016 22:14:56 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160118061456.GA9099@dtor-ws> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160118051125.GA23372@kroah.com>

On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 09:11:25PM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 06:11:38PM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > When probing platform drivers let's check if corresponding devices have
> > "wakeup-source" property defined (either in device tree, ACPI, or static
> > platform properties) and automatically enable such devices as wakeup
> > sources for the system. This will help us standardize on the name for this
> > property and reduce amount of boilerplate code in the drivers.
> 
> How much boilerplate code can be removed?  Do you have an example patch
> of this removal for any drivers if we move this logic into the driver core?

Admittedly not a lot, a few lines. There is a couple of lines for
checking the property and calling device_init_wakeup() and also
sometimes clearing wakeup flag is the only thing that is left in
remove() method after converting to devm*. I am more interested in
standardizing on the property name and having wakeup flag cleared on
removal or probe failure, similarly how we do it for driver data in
device structure.

I do not have good patches in input at the moment as even though we are
using "wakeup-source" now lots if the drivers did not start with it and
so we have compatibility parsing still that we want to keep around. I
want the new drivers to use only this property though.

FWIW I2C bus code implements automatic parsing of this property as well
and I wonder if we want to do the same for SPI.

Thanks.

-- 
Dmitry

  reply	other threads:[~2016-01-18  6:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-18  2:11 [PATCH] driver-core: platform: automatically mark wakeup devices Dmitry Torokhov
2016-01-18  5:11 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2016-01-18  6:14   ` Dmitry Torokhov [this message]
2016-01-18 15:35     ` Sudeep Holla
2016-01-18 14:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-01-18 15:23   ` Sudeep Holla
2016-01-18 15:41     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-01-18 15:58       ` Sudeep Holla
2016-01-18 17:09         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-01-18 16:22   ` Dmitry Torokhov
2016-01-18 17:19     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-01-18 17:55       ` Dmitry Torokhov
2016-01-18 22:18         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-01-20  0:45           ` Dmitry Torokhov
2016-01-20  2:40             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-01-20 13:51               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-01-20 23:01                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-01-21  0:23                   ` Dmitry Torokhov
2016-01-26 16:47                     ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160118061456.GA9099@dtor-ws \
    --to=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=grant.likely@linaro.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=treding@nvidia.com \
    --cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox