From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Cc: syzkaller <syzkaller@googlegroups.com>,
Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Tavis Ormandy <taviso@google.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Quentin Casasnovas <quentin.casasnovas@oracle.com>,
Kostya Serebryany <kcc@google.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@google.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
David Drysdale <drysdale@google.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] kernel: add kcov code coverage
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2016 14:13:52 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160118141352.GM21067@leverpostej> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACT4Y+YvL_L9a2dBfoXQ0AKpKmnypfObtt7k97j_i2Qiu=wnQg@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 03:07:59PM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 2:05 PM, Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com> wrote:
> > 2016-01-14 17:30 GMT+03:00 Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>:
> >> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 11:50 AM, Andrey Ryabinin
> >> <ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> 2016-01-13 15:48 GMT+03:00 Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>:
> >>>
> >>>> + /* Read number of PCs collected. */
> >>>> + n = __atomic_load_n(&cover[0], __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
> >>>> + /* PCs are shorten to uint32_t, so we need to restore the upper part. */
> >>>> + for (i = 0; i < n; i++)
> >>>> + printf("0xffffffff%0lx\n", (unsigned long)cover[i + 1]);
> >>
> >> Thanks for the review!
> >> Mailed v3 with fixes.
> >> Comments inline.
> >>
> >>> This works only for x86-64.
> >>> Probably there is no simple way to make this arch-independent with
> >>> 32-bit values.
> >>
> >> We probably could add an ioctl that returns base of the stripped PCs.
> >
> > You forgot about modules. With stripped PCs you'll start mixing
> > kernel's and module's PC (if distance between module and kernel > 4G).
>
> It's just that on x86 text and modules are within 4GB.
>
> I've checked that on arm64 it also seems to be the case:
>
> 48 * The module space lives between the addresses given by TASK_SIZE
> 49 * and PAGE_OFFSET - it must be within 128MB of the kernel text.
> 50 */
> 54 #define MODULES_END (PAGE_OFFSET)
> 55 #define MODULES_VADDR (MODULES_END - SZ_64M)
This won't necessarily remain true. With kASLR [1,2] the modules and
kernel might be located anywhere in the vmalloc area, independently.
Using PLTs removes the +/-128MB restriction, so they may be placed
anywhere in the vmalloc area.
On my defconfig kernel (4KiB, 39-bit VA) today, that area is ~246GiB wide:
[ 0.000000] Virtual kernel memory layout:
[ 0.000000] vmalloc : 0xffffff8000000000 - 0xffffffbdbfff0000 ( 246 GB)
[ 0.000000] vmemmap : 0xffffffbdc0000000 - 0xffffffbfc0000000 ( 8 GB maximum)
[ 0.000000] 0xffffffbdc2000000 - 0xffffffbde8000000 ( 608 MB actual)
[ 0.000000] fixed : 0xffffffbffa7fd000 - 0xffffffbffac00000 ( 4108 KB)
[ 0.000000] PCI I/O : 0xffffffbffae00000 - 0xffffffbffbe00000 ( 16 MB)
[ 0.000000] modules : 0xffffffbffc000000 - 0xffffffc000000000 ( 64 MB)
[ 0.000000] memory : 0xffffffc000000000 - 0xffffffc980000000 ( 38912 MB)
[ 0.000000] .init : 0xffffffc000a00000 - 0xffffffc000a9c000 ( 624 KB)
[ 0.000000] .text : 0xffffffc000080000 - 0xffffffc000a00000 ( 9728 KB)
[ 0.000000] .data : 0xffffffc000a9c000 - 0xffffffc000b17a00 ( 495 KB)
Kernels can be built with a 48-bit VA (and potentially larger in future
with ARMv8.2-A or later [3]). The vmalloc area (and hence the maximum
distances between modules and kernel) will increase grow with the VA
range.
Thanks,
Mark.
[1] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2016-January/398527.html
[2] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2016-January/398534.html
[3] https://community.arm.com/groups/processors/blog/2016/01/05/armv8-a-architecture-evolution
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-18 14:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-13 12:48 [PATCH v2] kernel: add kcov code coverage Dmitry Vyukov
2016-01-13 22:31 ` kbuild test robot
2016-01-14 9:03 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2016-01-14 9:10 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2016-01-14 9:23 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2016-01-14 12:21 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2016-01-14 12:35 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2016-01-14 12:49 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2016-01-14 14:24 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2016-01-14 10:50 ` Andrey Ryabinin
2016-01-14 14:30 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2016-01-15 13:05 ` Andrey Ryabinin
2016-01-15 13:42 ` Will Deacon
2016-01-15 14:07 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2016-01-18 13:34 ` Andrey Ryabinin
2016-01-18 19:31 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2016-01-18 14:13 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2016-01-18 19:44 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2016-01-18 20:09 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2016-01-22 11:55 ` Mark Rutland
2016-01-22 12:15 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2016-01-22 12:52 ` Mark Rutland
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160118141352.GM21067@leverpostej \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=drysdale@google.com \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=kcc@google.com \
--cc=keescook@google.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=quentin.casasnovas@oracle.com \
--cc=sasha.levin@oracle.com \
--cc=syzkaller@googlegroups.com \
--cc=taviso@google.com \
--cc=vegard.nossum@oracle.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox