From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933234AbcASWA7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Jan 2016 17:00:59 -0500 Received: from ud10.udmedia.de ([194.117.254.50]:44719 "EHLO mail.ud10.udmedia.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932956AbcASWAx (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Jan 2016 17:00:53 -0500 Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 23:00:50 +0100 From: Markus Trippelsdorf To: Ben Hutchings Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH perf 0/4] Build fixes for gcc 6 Message-ID: <20160119220050.GE321@x4> References: <20160119213213.GB2637@decadent.org.uk> <20160119214018.GD321@x4> <20160119215848.GH2637@decadent.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160119215848.GH2637@decadent.org.uk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2016.01.19 at 21:58 +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 10:40:18PM +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote: > > On 2016.01.19 at 21:32 +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > gcc 6 warns about various things in tools/perf and with -Werror > > > these turn into build failures. One of them is a real though not > > > very serious bug. > > > > I've already send patches for 1,2 and 4. See: > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/12/14/460 > > > > Not sure what happened with them. Also your patch number 4 is wrong, you > > should just delete the semicolon. > > I think that the busy-wait, intentional or not, may be a necessary > part of the test case. Well, the author of the code thinks otherwise: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/12/14/269 -- Markus