From: Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: "Borislav Petkov" <bp@suse.de>, "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@kernel.org>,
"Andy Lutomirski" <luto@amacapital.net>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Robert Richter" <rric@kernel.org>,
"Jacob Shin" <jacob.w.shin@gmail.com>,
"John Stultz" <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
"Fr�d�ric Weisbecker" <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, spg_linux_kernel@amd.com,
x86@kernel.org, "Guenter Roeck" <linux@roeck-us.net>,
"Andreas Herrmann" <herrmann.der.user@googlemail.com>,
"Suravee Suthikulpanit" <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>,
"Aravind Gopalakrishnan" <Aravind.Gopalakrishnan@amd.com>,
"Borislav Petkov" <bp@alien8.de>,
"Fengguang Wu" <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
"Aaron Lu" <aaron.lu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] perf/x86/amd/power: Add AMD accumulated power reporting mechanism
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 12:48:24 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160120044823.GA13477@hr-amur2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160119121250.GA6344@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Hi Peter,
Thanks so much to your comments.
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 01:12:50PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 10:50:08AM +0800, Huang Rui wrote:
> > +struct power_pmu {
> > + spinlock_t lock;
>
> This should be a raw_spinlock_t, as it'll be nested under other
> raw_spinlock_t's.
>
Do you mean the following spinlock operations are in hardware
interrupts disabled case, so I need use raw_spinlock_t instead, right?
Use raw_spin_lock_irqsave/raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore?
> > + struct list_head active_list;
> > + struct pmu *pmu; /* pointer to power_pmu_class */
> > + local64_t cpu_sw_pwr_ptsc;
> > +};
>
> > +static void pmu_event_start(struct perf_event *event, int mode)
> > +{
> > + struct power_pmu *pmu = __this_cpu_read(amd_power_pmu);
> > + unsigned long flags;
> > +
> > + spin_lock_irqsave(&pmu->lock, flags);
>
> IRQs will be disabled here.
>
> > + __pmu_event_start(pmu, event);
> > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pmu->lock, flags);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void pmu_event_stop(struct perf_event *event, int mode)
> > +{
> > + struct power_pmu *pmu = __this_cpu_read(amd_power_pmu);
> > + struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
> > + unsigned long flags;
> > +
> > + spin_lock_irqsave(&pmu->lock, flags);
>
> idem
>
> > +
> > + /* mark event as deactivated and stopped */
> > + if (!(hwc->state & PERF_HES_STOPPED)) {
> > + list_del(&event->active_entry);
> > + hwc->state |= PERF_HES_STOPPED;
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* check if update of sw counter is necessary */
> > + if ((mode & PERF_EF_UPDATE) && !(hwc->state & PERF_HES_UPTODATE)) {
> > + /*
> > + * Drain the remaining delta count out of a event
> > + * that we are disabling:
> > + */
> > + event_update(event, pmu);
> > + hwc->state |= PERF_HES_UPTODATE;
> > + }
> > +
> > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pmu->lock, flags);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int pmu_event_add(struct perf_event *event, int mode)
> > +{
> > + struct power_pmu *pmu = __this_cpu_read(amd_power_pmu);
> > + struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
> > + unsigned long flags;
> > +
> > + spin_lock_irqsave(&pmu->lock, flags);
> > +
>
> idem
>
> > + hwc->state = PERF_HES_UPTODATE | PERF_HES_STOPPED;
> > +
> > + if (mode & PERF_EF_START)
> > + __pmu_event_start(pmu, event);
> > +
> > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pmu->lock, flags);
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
>
>
> > +static int power_cpu_init(int cpu)
> > +{
> > + int i, cu, ret = 0;
> > + cpumask_var_t mask, dummy_mask;
> > +
> > + cu = cpu / cores_per_cu;
> > +
> > + if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&mask, GFP_KERNEL))
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > + if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&dummy_mask, GFP_KERNEL)) {
> > + ret = -ENOMEM;
> > + goto out;
> > + }
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < cores_per_cu; i++)
> > + cpumask_set_cpu(i, mask);
> > +
> > + cpumask_shift_left(mask, mask, cu * cores_per_cu);
> > +
> > + if (!cpumask_and(dummy_mask, mask, &cpu_mask))
> > + cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &cpu_mask);
> > +
> > + free_cpumask_var(dummy_mask);
> > +out:
> > + free_cpumask_var(mask);
> > +
> > + return ret;
> > +}
>
> > +static int power_cpu_notifier(struct notifier_block *self,
> > + unsigned long action, void *hcpu)
> > +{
> > + unsigned int cpu = (long)hcpu;
> > +
> > + switch (action & ~CPU_TASKS_FROZEN) {
> > + case CPU_UP_PREPARE:
> > + if (power_cpu_prepare(cpu))
> > + return NOTIFY_BAD;
> > + break;
> > + case CPU_STARTING:
> > + if (power_cpu_init(cpu))
> > + return NOTIFY_BAD;
>
> this is called with IRQs disabled, which makes those GFP_KERNEL allocs
> above a pretty bad idea.
>
Right, so should I use GFP_ATOMIC to allocate cpumask here?
> Also, note that -rt cannot actually do _any_ allocations/frees from
> STARTING.
>
> Please move the allocs/frees to PREPARE/ONLINE.
>
How about add two cpumask_var_t at power_pmu structure? Then allocate
the two cpumask_var_t (pmu->mask, pmu->dummy_mask), and they can be
also used on power_cpu_init.
Thanks,
Rui
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-20 4:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-14 2:50 [PATCH v2 0/5] perf/x86/power: Introduce AMD accumlated power reporting mechanism Huang Rui
2016-01-14 2:50 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] x86/amd: move nodes_per_socket into bsp_init_amd Huang Rui
2016-03-21 9:54 ` [tip:perf/urgent] perf/x86/amd: Move nodes_per_socket into bsp_init_amd() tip-bot for Huang Rui
2016-01-14 2:50 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] x86/amd: add accessor for number of cores per compute unit Huang Rui
2016-01-14 2:50 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] x86/cpufeature: add AMD Accumulated Power Mechanism feature flag Huang Rui
2016-03-21 9:55 ` [tip:perf/urgent] x86/cpufeature, perf/x86: Add " tip-bot for Huang Rui
2016-01-14 2:50 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] perf/x86: Move events_sysfs_show outside CPU_SUP_INTEL Huang Rui
2016-01-14 2:50 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] perf/x86/amd/power: Add AMD accumulated power reporting mechanism Huang Rui
2016-01-19 12:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-20 4:48 ` Huang Rui [this message]
2016-01-20 9:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-21 7:04 ` Huang Rui
2016-01-21 9:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-21 14:42 ` Huang Rui
2016-01-21 15:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-21 15:24 ` Huang Rui
2016-01-21 15:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-21 16:59 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-01-22 8:04 ` Huang Rui
2016-01-22 17:51 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-01-14 6:01 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] perf/x86/power: Introduce AMD accumlated " Borislav Petkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160120044823.GA13477@hr-amur2 \
--to=ray.huang@amd.com \
--cc=Aravind.Gopalakrishnan@amd.com \
--cc=aaron.lu@intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=herrmann.der.user@googlemail.com \
--cc=jacob.w.shin@gmail.com \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rric@kernel.org \
--cc=spg_linux_kernel@amd.com \
--cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox