From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758380AbcATUAI (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Jan 2016 15:00:08 -0500 Received: from ipmail04.adl6.internode.on.net ([150.101.137.141]:7693 "EHLO ipmail04.adl6.internode.on.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758346AbcATUAB (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Jan 2016 15:00:01 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A2AvCQDg5Z9WPGwtLHleKAECgw9SbYhXnywGi1yFQYQFHoVrAgIBAQKBRU0BAQEBAQEHAQEBAUE/hDUBAQQ6HCMQCAMHEQklDwUlAwcaE4gavQUBAQgCAR0YhVqFPIQ7hFEFlwSNVoFnjSKKbINVhF0oLoVagTgBAQE Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 06:59:57 +1100 From: Dave Chinner To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Benjamin LaHaise , linux-aio@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux API , linux-mm , Alexander Viro , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/13] aio: enabled thread based async fsync Message-ID: <20160120195957.GV6033@dastard> References: <80934665e0dd2360e2583522c7c7569e5a92be0e.1452549431.git.bcrl@kvack.org> <20160112011128.GC6033@dastard> <20160112022548.GD6033@dastard> <20160112033708.GE6033@dastard> <20160115202131.GH6330@kvack.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 07:59:35PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 12:21 PM, Benjamin LaHaise wrote: > >> > >> I'll have to think about this some more. > > > > Any further thoughts on this after a few days worth of pondering? > > Sorry about the delay, with the merge window and me being sick for a > couple of days I didn't get around to this. > > After thinking it over some more, I guess I'm ok with your approach. > The table-driven patch makes me a bit happier, and I guess not very > many people end up ever wanting to do async system calls anyway. > > Are there other users outside of Solace? It would be good to get comments.. I know of quite a few storage/db products that use AIO. The most recent high profile project that have been reporting issues with AIO on XFS is http://www.scylladb.com/. That project is architected around non-blocking AIO for scalability reasons... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com