* Re: [PATCH] lpfc: Remove redundant code block in lpfc_scsi_cmd_iocb_cmpl
2016-01-20 15:08 [PATCH] lpfc: Remove redundant code block in lpfc_scsi_cmd_iocb_cmpl Johannes Thumshirn
@ 2016-01-20 16:01 ` Tomas Henzl
2016-01-20 16:19 ` Matthew R. Ochs
` (4 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Tomas Henzl @ 2016-01-20 16:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Johannes Thumshirn, Martin K . Petersen, James Bottomley,
James Smart, Dick Kennedy
Cc: linux-scsi, linux-kernel
On 20.1.2016 16:08, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
> This removes a redundant code block that will either be executed if the
> ENABLE_FCP_RING_POLLING flag is set in phba->cfg_poll or not. The code is just
> duplicated in both cases, hence we unify it again.
>
> This probably is a left over from some sort of refactoring.
>
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Henzl <thenzl@redhat.com>
Tomas
> ---
> drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_scsi.c | 17 -----------------
> 1 file changed, 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_scsi.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_scsi.c
> index 152b3c8..3bd0be6 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_scsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_scsi.c
> @@ -4139,23 +4139,6 @@ lpfc_scsi_cmd_iocb_cmpl(struct lpfc_hba *phba, struct lpfc_iocbq *pIocbIn,
> /* The sdev is not guaranteed to be valid post scsi_done upcall. */
> cmd->scsi_done(cmd);
>
> - if (phba->cfg_poll & ENABLE_FCP_RING_POLLING) {
> - spin_lock_irqsave(&phba->hbalock, flags);
> - lpfc_cmd->pCmd = NULL;
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&phba->hbalock, flags);
> -
> - /*
> - * If there is a thread waiting for command completion
> - * wake up the thread.
> - */
> - spin_lock_irqsave(shost->host_lock, flags);
> - if (lpfc_cmd->waitq)
> - wake_up(lpfc_cmd->waitq);
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(shost->host_lock, flags);
> - lpfc_release_scsi_buf(phba, lpfc_cmd);
> - return;
> - }
> -
> spin_lock_irqsave(&phba->hbalock, flags);
> lpfc_cmd->pCmd = NULL;
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&phba->hbalock, flags);
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] lpfc: Remove redundant code block in lpfc_scsi_cmd_iocb_cmpl
2016-01-20 15:08 [PATCH] lpfc: Remove redundant code block in lpfc_scsi_cmd_iocb_cmpl Johannes Thumshirn
2016-01-20 16:01 ` Tomas Henzl
@ 2016-01-20 16:19 ` Matthew R. Ochs
2016-01-20 21:52 ` Sebastian Herbszt
` (3 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Matthew R. Ochs @ 2016-01-20 16:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Johannes Thumshirn
Cc: Martin K . Petersen, James Bottomley, James Smart, Dick Kennedy,
linux-scsi, linux-kernel
Reviewed-by: Matthew R. Ochs <mrochs@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] lpfc: Remove redundant code block in lpfc_scsi_cmd_iocb_cmpl
2016-01-20 15:08 [PATCH] lpfc: Remove redundant code block in lpfc_scsi_cmd_iocb_cmpl Johannes Thumshirn
2016-01-20 16:01 ` Tomas Henzl
2016-01-20 16:19 ` Matthew R. Ochs
@ 2016-01-20 21:52 ` Sebastian Herbszt
2016-01-27 2:33 ` Martin K. Petersen
` (2 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Sebastian Herbszt @ 2016-01-20 21:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Johannes Thumshirn
Cc: Martin K . Petersen, James Bottomley, James Smart, Dick Kennedy,
linux-scsi, linux-kernel, Sebastian Herbszt
Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
> This removes a redundant code block that will either be executed if the
> ENABLE_FCP_RING_POLLING flag is set in phba->cfg_poll or not. The code is just
> duplicated in both cases, hence we unify it again.
>
> This probably is a left over from some sort of refactoring.
>
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Sebastian Herbszt <herbszt@gmx.de>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] lpfc: Remove redundant code block in lpfc_scsi_cmd_iocb_cmpl
2016-01-20 15:08 [PATCH] lpfc: Remove redundant code block in lpfc_scsi_cmd_iocb_cmpl Johannes Thumshirn
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2016-01-20 21:52 ` Sebastian Herbszt
@ 2016-01-27 2:33 ` Martin K. Petersen
2016-02-10 17:37 ` Martin K. Petersen
2016-02-11 0:15 ` Martin K. Petersen
5 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Martin K. Petersen @ 2016-01-27 2:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Johannes Thumshirn
Cc: Martin K . Petersen, James Bottomley, James Smart, Dick Kennedy,
linux-scsi, linux-kernel
>>>>> "Johannes" == Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de> writes:
Johannes> This removes a redundant code block that will either be
Johannes> executed if the ENABLE_FCP_RING_POLLING flag is set in
Johannes> phba->cfg_poll or not. The code is just duplicated in both
Johannes> cases, hence we unify it again.
Johannes> This probably is a left over from some sort of refactoring.
James/Dick: Please review.
--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] lpfc: Remove redundant code block in lpfc_scsi_cmd_iocb_cmpl
2016-01-20 15:08 [PATCH] lpfc: Remove redundant code block in lpfc_scsi_cmd_iocb_cmpl Johannes Thumshirn
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2016-01-27 2:33 ` Martin K. Petersen
@ 2016-02-10 17:37 ` Martin K. Petersen
[not found] ` <CAGx+d6cx7CABJpbzOq4ZkifrhXEs-HyNQdezBb6wX6n0N0HrEg@mail.gmail.com>
2016-02-11 0:15 ` Martin K. Petersen
5 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Martin K. Petersen @ 2016-02-10 17:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Johannes Thumshirn
Cc: Martin K . Petersen, James Bottomley, James Smart, Dick Kennedy,
linux-scsi, linux-kernel
>>>>> "Johannes" == Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de> writes:
Johannes> This removes a redundant code block that will either be
Johannes> executed if the ENABLE_FCP_RING_POLLING flag is set in
Johannes> phba->cfg_poll or not. The code is just duplicated in both
Johannes> cases, hence we unify it again.
James and Dick: Ping!
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8072451/
--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] lpfc: Remove redundant code block in lpfc_scsi_cmd_iocb_cmpl
2016-01-20 15:08 [PATCH] lpfc: Remove redundant code block in lpfc_scsi_cmd_iocb_cmpl Johannes Thumshirn
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2016-02-10 17:37 ` Martin K. Petersen
@ 2016-02-11 0:15 ` Martin K. Petersen
5 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Martin K. Petersen @ 2016-02-11 0:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Johannes Thumshirn
Cc: Martin K . Petersen, James Bottomley, James Smart, Dick Kennedy,
linux-scsi, linux-kernel
>>>>> "Johannes" == Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de> writes:
Johannes> This removes a redundant code block that will either be
Johannes> executed if the ENABLE_FCP_RING_POLLING flag is set in
Johannes> phba->cfg_poll or not. The code is just duplicated in both
Johannes> cases, hence we unify it again.
Johannes> This probably is a left over from some sort of refactoring.
Applied to 4.6/scsi-queue.
--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread