From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753429AbcAVOtA (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Jan 2016 09:49:00 -0500 Received: from mail-wm0-f49.google.com ([74.125.82.49]:38045 "EHLO mail-wm0-f49.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752902AbcAVOsz (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Jan 2016 09:48:55 -0500 Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2016 15:48:51 +0100 From: Pali =?utf-8?B?Um9ow6Fy?= To: =?utf-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBLxJlwaWXFhA==?= Cc: Darren Hart , Matthew Garrett , Richard Purdie , Jacek Anaszewski , platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, linux-leds@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/16] Common Dell SMBIOS API Message-ID: <20160122144851.GN7192@pali> References: <1453472848-3118-1-git-send-email-kernel@kempniu.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <1453472848-3118-1-git-send-email-kernel@kempniu.pl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23.1 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Friday 22 January 2016 15:27:12 Michał Kępień wrote: > Note: > > In this series (both v1 and v2) I tried to stick to the overall > concept used in dell-laptop, but in the v1 thread me and Pali also > briefly discussed his alternative ideas [1][2] as to what this API > could look like, so feel free to suggest a different approach. > > [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/platform-driver-x86/msg08260.html > [2] http://www.spinics.net/lists/platform-driver-x86/msg08268.html I would like to hear opinion about dell-smbios API also from other people. Darren, can you look and comment it? -- Pali Rohár pali.rohar@gmail.com