From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>,
Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>,
ast@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>,
pi3orama@163.com, Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: clang --target=bpf missing on f23 was: Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf test: Add libbpf relocation checker
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2016 16:09:40 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160122190940.GJ4034@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56A26D32.90806@iogearbox.net>
Em Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 06:56:02PM +0100, Daniel Borkmann escreveu:
> On 01/22/2016 06:35 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> >On Fri, 2016-01-22 at 14:22 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> >
> >> the 'bpf' target for clang is being used together with perf to
> >>build scriptlets into object code that then gets uploaded to the kernel
> >>via sys_bpf(), was the decision not to include 'bpf' just an accident?
> >
> >I wouldn't call it a "decision", that would imply intent. The main
> >reason I explicitly list targets for llvm is to limit the CPU backends
> >to arches Fedora actually runs on (which itself is because I really
> >only care about llvmpipe, and am only touching llvm because it's in my
> >way). Had no idea there was a bpf backend, so never thought to enable
> >it.
> >
> >llvm-3.7.0-4.fc2{3,4} are building now with the bpf backend enabled,
> >I'll create an update for F23 when it's built.
>
> Awesome, thanks!
Seconded, thanks for the fast response and for adding the bpf target!
Now that is a good, intentional decision 8-)
- Arnaldo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-22 19:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-22 9:27 [PATCH 0/2] perf bpf: Fix relocation error Wang Nan
2016-01-22 9:27 ` [PATCH 1/2] perf test: Add libbpf relocation checker Wang Nan
2016-01-22 15:40 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-01-22 17:07 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2016-01-22 17:22 ` clang --target=bpf missing on f23 was: " Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-01-22 17:35 ` Adam Jackson
2016-01-22 17:42 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2016-01-22 21:09 ` David Airlie
2016-01-22 17:56 ` Daniel Borkmann
2016-01-22 19:09 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2016-01-22 9:27 ` [PATCH 2/2] perf bpf: Check relocation target section Wang Nan
2016-01-22 17:11 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2016-01-25 1:56 ` Wangnan (F)
2016-01-25 2:04 ` Wangnan (F)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160122190940.GJ4034@kernel.org \
--to=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=airlied@redhat.com \
--cc=ajax@redhat.com \
--cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizefan@huawei.com \
--cc=pi3orama@163.com \
--cc=wangnan0@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).