From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1751704AbcAWGj7 (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Sat, 23 Jan 2016 01:39:59 -0500
Received: from mail-pa0-f50.google.com ([209.85.220.50]:34059 "EHLO
	mail-pa0-f50.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1750823AbcAWGj6 (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sat, 23 Jan 2016 01:39:58 -0500
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2016 12:09:47 +0530
From: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>
To: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
Cc: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip@vectorindia.org>, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
        lkp@01.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [LKP] [lkp] [spi] 2baed30cb3: BUG: scheduling while atomic:
 systemd-udevd/134/0x00000002
Message-ID: <20160123063947.GA26921@sudip-pc>
References: <87bn8h5bbe.fsf@yhuang-dev.intel.com>
 <20160120044247.GA3238@sudip-pc>
 <87a8o0yhdz.fsf@yhuang-dev.intel.com>
 <20160121053310.GA4782@sudip-pc>
 <87oacfqyap.fsf@yhuang-dev.intel.com>
 <20160121060652.GA5697@sudip-pc>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20160121060652.GA5697@sudip-pc>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Hi Huang, Ying,
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 11:36:52AM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 01:47:10PM +0800, Huang, Ying wrote:
> > Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> writes:
> > 
> > > On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 01:00:40PM +0800, Huang, Ying wrote:
> > >> Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> writes:
> > >> 
> > >> > On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 08:44:37AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> <snip>
> > >
> > > I am not able to reproduce this. Tested just with the kernel and
> > > yocto-minimal-i386.cgz filesystem and it booted properly.
> > >
> > > I guess I need atleast your job file to reproduce this.
> > 
> > This is a boot test so I did not attached the job file.  But the test
> > result may depends on specific root file system.  For example, the
> > process when BUG report is always systemd-udevd.  Maybe you need a
> > systemd based root file system.
> 
> So silly of me. Since you said 2baed30cb3, so i kept looking at that
> patch.
> Can you please test again after reverting:
> ebd43516d387 ("Staging: panel: usleep_range is preferred over udelay")
> 
> If it solves the problem then I will submit a formal patch.

Did you get a chance to test it?

regards
sudip