From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754964AbcAWVRa (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 Jan 2016 16:17:30 -0500 Received: from mail-pa0-f51.google.com ([209.85.220.51]:35379 "EHLO mail-pa0-f51.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753633AbcAWVR1 (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 Jan 2016 16:17:27 -0500 Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2016 13:17:23 -0800 From: Brian Norris To: Han Xu Cc: Yao Yuan , Yuan Yao , David Woodhouse , "han.xu@freescale.com" , "linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: mtd: spi-nor: fsl-quadspi: add support for ls1021a Message-ID: <20160123211723.GA24744@localhost> References: <1453362836-44377-1-git-send-email-yao.yuan@freescale.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 11:30:55AM -0600, Han Xu wrote: > On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 3:01 AM, Yao Yuan wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 11:42 PM, Han Xu < xhnjupt@gmail.com > wrote: > >> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 1:53 AM, Yuan Yao wrote: > >> > Any extra information you can find them on the patchwork: > >> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8078931/ > >> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8078951/ > >> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8079091/ > >> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8078941/ > >> > >> Please send all patches in one patch set, this is not acceptable. > >> > > > > Thanks for your review. > > But those patches are dts binding patch. And will send to devicetree@vger.kernel.org and some corresponding maintainer. > > > > Those two patch sets will send to different mail-list and maintainers separately. > > > > So, maybe it's better to send the patch to the maintainer accordingly and thus I think can also reduce the workload of maintainer. > > > > How about your think? > > Send the complete patch set to maintainer and cc all related > sub-module groups, so everybody could understand the whole story. Agreed. You apparently did not read the suggested documentation from last time: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.txt Particularly, points 2 and 3. Subsystem maintainers merge binding patches, so please send them as part of the regular series. Brian