From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932419AbcAYLyL (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Jan 2016 06:54:11 -0500 Received: from mga04.intel.com ([192.55.52.120]:40024 "EHLO mga04.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932650AbcAYLvP (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Jan 2016 06:51:15 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.22,344,1449561600"; d="scan'208";a="897783162" Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2016 13:49:03 +0200 From: Mika Westerberg To: Antoine Tenart Cc: ptyser@xes-inc.com, lee.jones@linaro.org, linus.walleij@linaro.org, gnurou@gmail.com, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mathias Nyman Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] gpio: Intel Baytrail support Message-ID: <20160125114903.GE1790@lahna.fi.intel.com> References: <1453566729-30220-1-git-send-email-antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1453566729-30220-1-git-send-email-antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 05:32:06PM +0100, Antoine Tenart wrote: > This series introduces the GPIO Intel Baytrail support, using both the > lpc ich and the gpio ich drivers. > > Antoine Tenart (3): > gpio: gpio-ich: add support for Intel Baytrail Intel Baytrail support has been in mainline kernel for quite some time already. The driver is drivers/pintctrl/intel/pinctrl-baytrail.c. Also the ICH GPIO block is not compatible to Baytrail which is why there is a separate driver in the first place. Have you tested this series on Baytrail? > mfd: lpc_ich: use a correct mask for the GPIO base address > mfd: lpc_ich: add GPIO support for Baytrail All Baytrails I've seen expose the GPIO device via ACPI namespace so there should be no need for the above two patches.