From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932723AbcAYPUr (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Jan 2016 10:20:47 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:58898 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932120AbcAYPUp (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Jan 2016 10:20:45 -0500 Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2016 16:20:41 +0100 From: Radim =?utf-8?Q?Krcm=C3=A1r?= To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: "Wu, Feng" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] KVM: x86: Use vector-hashing to deliver lowest-priority interrupts Message-ID: <20160125152040.GC21252@potion.brq.redhat.com> References: <1453254177-103002-1-git-send-email-feng.wu@intel.com> <1453254177-103002-3-git-send-email-feng.wu@intel.com> <20160121194950.GC17514@potion.brq.redhat.com> <20160122140154.GD14104@potion.brq.redhat.com> <56A61432.3010500@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <56A61432.3010500@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 2016-01-25 13:25+0100, Paolo Bonzini: > On 22/01/2016 15:01, Radim Krcmár wrote: >>> for (i = 0; i <= mod; i++) { >>> idx = find_next_bit(bitmap, bitmap_size, idx + 1); >>> BUG_ON(idx == bitmap_size); >>> } > > WARN_ON, not BUG_ON. Callers don't check the return value for an error, because every error is a BUG now. I think that we should check if we return bitmap_size. (Current paths could dereference NULL or throw unrelated warnings.) Also, WARN_ON_ONCE?