linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>,
	Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Stas Sergeev <stsp@list.ru>,
	Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@parallels.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] x86: sigcontext fixes, again
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 11:22:43 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160126082243.GF22280@uranus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1453754484.git.luto@kernel.org>

On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 01:34:11PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> This is take 2 at fixing x86 64-bit signals wrt SS.  After a lot of
> thought, this is not controlled by any flags -- I would much prefer
> to avoid opt-in behavior.  Instead, it just tries hard to avoid
> triggering the cases that break DOSEMU.
> 
> Stas, this now seems to pass the test you sent me.  It works with
> stock dosemu2 (I haven't tested classic dosemu because I can't get it
> to work regardless).  It also works with a patched dosemu2 that bypasses
> the userspace trampoline:
> 
> https://github.com/amluto/dosemu2/commit/571b4d08dc885b7a133e444a2ad23e0d21366206
> 
> With this applied, all of the x86 selftests pass on x86_64.  That
> wasn't the case before -- ldt_gdt_64 was broken.

I've been testing this series already. I guess ;) Anyway, gonna try
it one more shot at the evening, just to make sure. From a glance
everything looks just great!

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-01-26  8:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-25 21:34 [PATCH v3 0/4] x86: sigcontext fixes, again Andy Lutomirski
2016-01-25 21:34 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] x86/signal/64: Add a comment about sigcontext->fs and gs Andy Lutomirski
2016-01-25 21:34 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] x86/signal/64: Fix SS if needed when delivering a 64-bit signal Andy Lutomirski
2016-02-09 12:06   ` Borislav Petkov
2016-01-25 21:34 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] x86/signal/64: Re-add support for SS in the 64-bit signal context Andy Lutomirski
2016-02-11 19:49   ` Borislav Petkov
2016-02-12  1:01     ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-02-12 13:56       ` Borislav Petkov
2016-01-25 21:34 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] selftests/x86: Add tests for UC_SIGCONTEXT_SS and UC_STRICT_RESTORE_SS Andy Lutomirski
2016-02-11 19:53   ` Borislav Petkov
2016-02-12  0:46     ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-02-12 13:59       ` Borislav Petkov
2016-01-26  8:22 ` Cyrill Gorcunov [this message]
2016-01-26 19:51   ` [PATCH v3 0/4] x86: sigcontext fixes, again Cyrill Gorcunov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160126082243.GF22280@uranus \
    --to=gorcunov@gmail.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
    --cc=dvlasenk@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=stsp@list.ru \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xemul@parallels.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).