linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com>
Cc: "Borislav Petkov" <bp@suse.de>,
	"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"Andy Lutomirski" <luto@amacapital.net>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Robert Richter" <rric@kernel.org>,
	"Jacob Shin" <jacob.w.shin@gmail.com>,
	"John Stultz" <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
	"Frédéric Weisbecker" <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, spg_linux_kernel@amd.com,
	x86@kernel.org, "Guenter Roeck" <linux@roeck-us.net>,
	"Andreas Herrmann" <herrmann.der.user@googlemail.com>,
	"Suravee Suthikulpanit" <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>,
	"Aravind Gopalakrishnan" <Aravind.Gopalakrishnan@amd.com>,
	"Borislav Petkov" <bp@alien8.de>,
	"Fengguang Wu" <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
	"Aaron Lu" <aaron.lu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] perf/x86/amd/power: Add AMD accumulated power reporting mechanism
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 09:28:23 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160126082823.GA8729@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1453710723-1616-1-git-send-email-ray.huang@amd.com>


* Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com> wrote:

> +/*
> + * Acc power status counters
> + */
> +#define AMD_POWER_PKG_ID		0
> +#define AMD_POWER_EVENTSEL_PKG		1

> +/*
> + * the ratio of compute unit power accumulator sample period to the
> + * PTSC period
> + */

> +/*
> + * Accumulated power is to measure the sum of each compute unit's
> + * power consumption. So it picks only one core from each compute unit
> + * to get the power with MSR_F15H_CU_PWR_ACCUMULATOR. The cpu_mask
> + * represents CPU bit map of all cores which are picked to measure the
> + * power for the compute units that they belong to.
> + */
> +static cpumask_t cpu_mask;

> +	/*
> +	 * calculate the power comsumption for each compute unit over
> +	 * a time period, the unit of final value (delta) is
> +	 * micro-Watts. Then add it into event count.
> +	 */

Please capitalize sentences consistently - half of the comments you added start 
lower-case.

> +static void __pmu_event_start(struct power_pmu *pmu,
> +			      struct perf_event *event)

So this looks better either on a single line, or as:

static void
__pmu_event_start(struct power_pmu *pmu, struct perf_event *event)

Breaking the argument list combines the worst of the two worlds.

> +	if ((mode & PERF_EF_UPDATE) && !(hwc->state & PERF_HES_UPTODATE)) {
> +		/*
> +		 * Drain the remaining delta count out of a event
> +		 * that we are disabling:

s/an event

(Please re-read all the comments - I saw a few other typos and spelling mistakes 
as well.)

> +	if (cfg == AMD_POWER_EVENTSEL_PKG)
> +		bit = AMD_POWER_PKG_ID;
> +	else
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	event->hw.event_base = MSR_F15H_CU_PWR_ACCUMULATOR;
> +	event->hw.config = cfg;
> +	event->hw.idx = bit;
> +
> +	return ret;

so this control flow looks pretty weird. Why not:

> +	if (cfg != AMD_POWER_EVENTSEL_PKG)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	event->hw.event_base = MSR_F15H_CU_PWR_ACCUMULATOR;
> +	event->hw.config = cfg;
> +	event->hw.idx = AMD_POWER_PKG_ID;
> +
> +	return ret;

?

> +static struct attribute_group pmu_attr_group = {
> +	.attrs = pmu_attrs,
> +};
> +
> +
> +/*
> + * at current, it only supports to report the power of each

s/currently it only supports power reporting of each

> + * processor/package
> + */
> +EVENT_ATTR_STR(power-pkg, power_pkg, "event=0x01");
> +
> +EVENT_ATTR_STR(power-pkg.unit, power_pkg_unit, "mWatts");
> +
> +/* convert the count from micro-Watts to milli-Watts */
> +EVENT_ATTR_STR(power-pkg.scale, power_pkg_scale, "1.000000e-3");
> +
> +
> +static struct attribute *events_attr[] = {
> +	EVENT_PTR(power_pkg),
> +	EVENT_PTR(power_pkg_unit),
> +	EVENT_PTR(power_pkg_scale),
> +	NULL,
> +};
> +
> +static struct attribute_group pmu_events_group = {
> +	.name = "events",
> +	.attrs = events_attr,

> +static struct attribute_group pmu_format_group = {
> +	.name = "format",
> +	.attrs = formats_attr,
> +};

Please initialize structures in a vertically aligned manner, like you did it later 
on:

> +static struct pmu pmu_class = {
> +	.attr_groups	= attr_groups,
> +	.task_ctx_nr	= perf_invalid_context, /* system-wide only */
> +	.event_init	= pmu_event_init,
> +	.add		= pmu_event_add, /* must have */
> +	.del		= pmu_event_del, /* must have */
> +	.start		= pmu_event_start,
> +	.stop		= pmu_event_stop,
> +	.read		= pmu_event_read,
> +};

Btw., I don't think the 'must have' comment adds any important information needed 
to understand this new PMU driver.

> +static int power_cpu_init(int cpu)
> +{
> +	struct power_pmu *pmu = per_cpu(amd_power_pmu, cpu);
> +
> +	if (pmu)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	if (!cpumask_and(pmu->mask, topology_sibling_cpumask(cpu),
> +			 &cpu_mask))
> +		cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &cpu_mask);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}

Hm, has this function ever been runtime tested? This function either does nothing 
(contrary to the clear intention of twiddling the cpu_mask), or crashes on a NULL 
pointer.

( Also, the code has an annoying line-break. Don't pacify checkpatch by making the 
  code harder to read. )

Thanks,

	Ingo

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-01-26  8:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-25  8:32 [PATCH v3] perf/x86/amd/power: Add AMD accumulated power reporting mechanism Huang Rui
2016-01-25 11:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-25 15:43   ` Huang Rui
2016-01-26  8:28 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2016-01-26 13:47   ` Huang Rui

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160126082823.GA8729@gmail.com \
    --to=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=Aravind.Gopalakrishnan@amd.com \
    --cc=aaron.lu@intel.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=bp@suse.de \
    --cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=herrmann.der.user@googlemail.com \
    --cc=jacob.w.shin@gmail.com \
    --cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=ray.huang@amd.com \
    --cc=rric@kernel.org \
    --cc=spg_linux_kernel@amd.com \
    --cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).