From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S934070AbcA0QZJ (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 27 Jan 2016 11:25:09 -0500
Received: from muru.com ([72.249.23.125]:57934 "EHLO muru.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S933567AbcA0QY4 (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 27 Jan 2016 11:24:56 -0500
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 08:24:53 -0800
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Pali =?utf-8?B?Um9ow6Fy?= <pali.rohar@gmail.com>,
        Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
        =?utf-8?Q?Beno=C3=AEt?= Cousson <bcousson@baylibre.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>,
        Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: n900: Include adp1653 device
Message-ID: <20160127162452.GJ19432@atomide.com>
References: <1451086812-3729-1-git-send-email-pali.rohar@gmail.com>
 <20160121091241.GS7192@pali>
 <20160121092909.GH5783@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
 <20160121101828.GA7411@amd>
 <20160121163857.GH19432@atomide.com>
 <20160121165408.GJ5783@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
 <20160127100237.GH25796@pali>
 <20160127111828.GK5783@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <20160127111828.GK5783@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

* Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> [160127 03:19]:
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 11:02:37AM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > In my opinion this patch is not support for new hardware. It just add
> > missing DT definition for one specific board for HW which was added to
> > linux kernel in v4.2-rc1 version. For me it looks like that needed DT
> > definition was forgotten...
> 
> Opinions differ, but ultimately it's up to whoever is responsible for
> accepting the patch, and in the case of ARM SoC based patches, the
> arm-soc maintainers.

Yeah. Sorry for long delay as discussed. I'm applying the $subject
patch finally into omap-for-v4.6/dt today.

We still have at least two fixes left to go that both affect also
n900. But at least I can now sanely test adding new stuff with a WIP
fix for the PM runtime regression.

> The arm-soc maintainers close their trees for development changes a
> few weeks before hand (a patch of mine which was acked etc by 7th
> December never made the 4.5 merge window either, and the alleged
> reason I've been told is because arm-soc was already closed by then).

Heh I too have some pending clock framework patches from December
that I did not repost yet as the maintainers notified that they
rather not take new stuff any longer for v4.5 before the holidays.

Regards,

Tony