From: Dave Penkler <dpenkler@gmail.com>
To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: peter.chen@freescale.com, teuniz@gmail.com,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v7 2/5] Add support for USBTMC USB488 SRQ notification with fasync
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 19:15:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160127181515.GB4658@slacky> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160127175742.GA4650@slacky>
Background:
By configuring an instrument's event status register various
conditions can be reported via an SRQ notification. This complements
the synchronous polling approach using the READ_STATUS_BYTE ioctl
with an asynchronous notification.
Signed-off-by: Dave Penkler <dpenkler@gmail.com>
---
drivers/usb/class/usbtmc.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/class/usbtmc.c b/drivers/usb/class/usbtmc.c
index c2eb6fe..d77da2f 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/class/usbtmc.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/class/usbtmc.c
@@ -99,6 +99,7 @@ struct usbtmc_device_data {
int iin_interval;
struct urb *iin_urb;
u16 iin_wMaxPacketSize;
+ atomic_t srq_asserted;
u8 rigol_quirk;
@@ -113,6 +114,7 @@ struct usbtmc_device_data {
struct kref kref;
struct mutex io_mutex; /* only one i/o function running at a time */
wait_queue_head_t waitq;
+ struct fasync_struct *fasync;
};
#define to_usbtmc_data(d) container_of(d, struct usbtmc_device_data, kref)
@@ -405,6 +407,9 @@ static int usbtmc488_ioctl_read_stb(struct usbtmc_device_data *data,
atomic_set(&data->iin_data_valid, 0);
+ /* must issue read_stb before using poll or select */
+ atomic_set(&data->srq_asserted, 0);
+
rv = usb_control_msg(data->usb_dev,
usb_rcvctrlpipe(data->usb_dev, 0),
USBTMC488_REQUEST_READ_STATUS_BYTE,
@@ -1172,6 +1177,13 @@ skip_io_on_zombie:
return retval;
}
+static int usbtmc_fasync(int fd, struct file *file, int on)
+{
+ struct usbtmc_device_data *data = file->private_data;
+
+ return fasync_helper(fd, file, on, &data->fasync);
+}
+
static const struct file_operations fops = {
.owner = THIS_MODULE,
.read = usbtmc_read,
@@ -1179,6 +1191,7 @@ static const struct file_operations fops = {
.open = usbtmc_open,
.release = usbtmc_release,
.unlocked_ioctl = usbtmc_ioctl,
+ .fasync = usbtmc_fasync,
.llseek = default_llseek,
};
@@ -1208,6 +1221,16 @@ static void usbtmc_interrupt(struct urb *urb)
wake_up_interruptible(&data->waitq);
goto exit;
}
+ /* check for SRQ notification */
+ if (data->iin_buffer[0] == 0x81) {
+ if (data->fasync)
+ kill_fasync(&data->fasync,
+ SIGIO, POLL_IN);
+
+ atomic_set(&data->srq_asserted, 1);
+ wake_up_interruptible(&data->waitq);
+ goto exit;
+ }
dev_warn(dev, "invalid notification: %x\n", data->iin_buffer[0]);
break;
case -EOVERFLOW:
@@ -1263,6 +1286,7 @@ static int usbtmc_probe(struct usb_interface *intf,
mutex_init(&data->io_mutex);
init_waitqueue_head(&data->waitq);
atomic_set(&data->iin_data_valid, 0);
+ atomic_set(&data->srq_asserted, 0);
data->zombie = 0;
/* Determine if it is a Rigol or not */
--
2.6.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-27 18:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-27 17:57 [PATCH v7 0/5] usb: usbtmc: Add support for missing functions in USBTMC-USB488 spec Dave Penkler
2016-01-27 18:09 ` [PATCH v7 1/5] Implement an ioctl to support the USMTMC-USB488 READ_STATUS_BYTE operation Dave Penkler
2016-01-27 18:15 ` Dave Penkler [this message]
2016-01-27 18:19 ` [PATCH v7 3/5] Add support for receiving USBTMC USB488 SRQ notifications via poll/select Dave Penkler
2016-01-27 18:22 ` [PATCH v7 4/5] Add ioctl to retrieve USBTMC-USB488 capabilities Dave Penkler
2016-01-27 18:25 ` [PATCH v7 5/5] Add ioctls to enable and disable local controls on an instrument Dave Penkler
2016-01-28 8:46 ` [PATCH v7 0/5] usb: usbtmc: Add support for missing functions in USBTMC-USB488 spec Clemens Ladisch
2016-01-29 17:34 ` Dave Penkler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160127181515.GB4658@slacky \
--to=dpenkler@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peter.chen@freescale.com \
--cc=teuniz@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox