From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755076AbcA1IhA (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jan 2016 03:37:00 -0500 Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:43391 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751534AbcA1Ig6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jan 2016 03:36:58 -0500 Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2016 00:36:56 -0800 From: Stephen Boyd To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: James Liao , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kbuild test robot , srv_heupstream@mediatek.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Mike Turquette , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, kbuild-all@01.org, Sascha Hauer , Matthias Brugger , linux-clk@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: Move vendor's Kconfig into CCF menu section Message-ID: <20160128083656.GM12841@codeaurora.org> References: <201601271708.gQUxXACW%fengguang.wu@intel.com> <4711589.Ig064LES4c@wuerfel> <1453888578.28646.7.camel@mtksdaap41> <6167008.u8jfFpmfhy@wuerfel> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6167008.u8jfFpmfhy@wuerfel> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 01/27, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Wednesday 27 January 2016 17:56:18 James Liao wrote: > > > > > > I think you should include this change in your patch, or as a preparation. > > > All other samsung platforms already select COMMON_CLK through ARCH_MULTIPLATFORM, > > > and all SoCs that are part of ARCH_S3C24XX individually select a symbol that > > > selects COMMON_CLK. > > > > Oops, I didn't notice there are warnings after moving these Kconfigs > > into menu section. > > > > The original motivation of this patch is preventing new clk drivers > > include their Kconfig in a wrong place, so it's not critical. Do you > > think we should apply this patch (with your changes below) or drop this > > patch directly? > > > I think your patch is good, we just need to fix S3C24xx, which is doing > things in a strange way for historic reasons. So far we've taken the approach of not caring if they include their Kconfig outside the common clk menu when all the configs inside the Kconfig file are hidden. Of course, when they aren't hidden this becomes a problem, but that isn't the case unless something changed recently. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project