From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1756544AbcA2QKN (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Fri, 29 Jan 2016 11:10:13 -0500
Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:59547 "EHLO
	mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1756262AbcA2QKL (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 29 Jan 2016 11:10:11 -0500
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2016 08:10:10 -0800
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo@padovan.org>,
        Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org,
        dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com>,
        Arve =?iso-8859-1?B?SGr4bm5lduVn?= <arve@android.com>,
        Riley Andrews <riandrews@android.com>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
        Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>, Greg Hackmann <ghackmann@google.com>,
        John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>,
        Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] sync framework de-staging: part 1 - clean up
Message-ID: <20160129161010.GA8372@kroah.com>
References: <1453380564-3328-1-git-send-email-gustavo@padovan.org>
 <56A605C8.8020703@linux.intel.com>
 <20160129144720.GA4043@joana>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20160129144720.GA4043@joana>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 12:47:20PM -0200, Gustavo Padovan wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> 2016-01-25 Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>:
> 
> > Hey,
> > 
> > Op 21-01-16 om 13:49 schreef Gustavo Padovan:
> > > From: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > The following patches are some clean ups on the sync framework before
> > > we start the actual de-staging. The main changes here are the move of
> > > SW_SYNC_USER to debugfs. Removal of struct sync_pt in favor of direct
> > > use of struct fence. And the rename of sync_fence to sync_file, a name
> > > to better reflect what it is for, a struct that connects struct fence(s)
> > > to a file.
> > >
> > > Please review. Thanks.
> > >
> > > Gustavo Padovan (11):
> > >   staging/android: fix sync framework documentation
> > >   staging/android: sync: remove interfaces that are not used
> > >   staging/android: remove not used sync_timeline ops
> > >   staging/android: create a 'sync' dir for debugfs information
> > >   staging/android: move SW_SYNC_USER to a debugfs file
> > >   staging/android: rename sync_fence to sync_file
> > >   staging/android: rename 'sync_pt' to 'fence' in struct sync_fence_cb
> > >   staging/android: remove struct sync_pt
> > >   staging/android: remove unused var from sync_timeline_signal()
> > >   staging/android: remove pointless sync_timeline_signal at destroy
> > >     phase
> > >   staging/android: remove sync_fence_create_dma()
> > >
> > For whole series:
> > Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
> > 
> > Renaming sync_fence to sync_file makes sense, it should hopefully reduce confusion.
> 
> Poke. What is missing for this to go upstream? Do I need more review
> here? Thanks.

You just sent this, give me a chance to get to it, my staging patch
queue is over 1000 patches at the moment :(

greg k-h