From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S933409AbcAaTGW (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Sun, 31 Jan 2016 14:06:22 -0500
Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:58053 "EHLO newverein.lst.de"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S933249AbcAaTGT (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sun, 31 Jan 2016 14:06:19 -0500
Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2016 20:06:16 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
        Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>,
        Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
        Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>,
        Sebastian Ott <sebott@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
        KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
        linux-s390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Virtualization <virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
        David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>,
        Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>,
        xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/10] virtio DMA API, yet again
Message-ID: <20160131190616.GA15840@lst.de>
References: <cover.1454034075.git.luto@kernel.org> <1454065260.133285.107.camel@infradead.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1454065260.133285.107.camel@infradead.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 11:01:00AM +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
> Also, wasn't Christoph looking at making per-device DMA ops more
> generic instead of an 'archdata' thing on basically every platform? Or
> did I just imagine that part?

What I've done for 4.5 is to switch all architectures to use DMA ops.
This should make it fairly easy to have a generic dma ops pointer in the
devie structure, but I have no need for that yet, and thus no short term
plans to do that work myself.