From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752913AbcBAJCu (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Feb 2016 04:02:50 -0500 Received: from mail-wm0-f53.google.com ([74.125.82.53]:33784 "EHLO mail-wm0-f53.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751787AbcBAJCn (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Feb 2016 04:02:43 -0500 Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 09:02:39 +0000 From: Lee Jones To: Laxman Dewangan Cc: kbuild test robot , kbuild-all@01.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, pawel.moll@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk, galak@codeaurora.org, linus.walleij@linaro.org, gnurou@gmail.com, broonie@kernel.org, a.zummo@towertech.it, alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com, lgirdwood@gmail.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, rtc-linux@googlegroups.com, swarren@nvidia.com, treding@nvidia.com, k.kozlowski@samsung.com, vreddytalla@nvidia.com, Mallikarjun Kasoju Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 2/8] mfd: max77620: add core driver for MAX77620/MAX20024 Message-ID: <20160201090239.GB3368@x1> References: <201601310157.sKXyINX7%fengguang.wu@intel.com> <56ACEEE1.1050800@nvidia.com> <20160201082553.GW3368@x1> <56AF17D6.2090106@nvidia.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <56AF17D6.2090106@nvidia.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 01 Feb 2016, Laxman Dewangan wrote: > > On Monday 01 February 2016 01:55 PM, Lee Jones wrote: > >On Sat, 30 Jan 2016, Laxman Dewangan wrote: > > > >>This depends on patch > >>[PATCH V2] mfd: core: add macro for adding mfd cells > >> > >>and due to absence of this patch, it reports the error. > >If you have dependencies, why aren't they in this set? > > > > This change is not related to the series as such and so independent. > I just thought that mentioning on commit log will be fine here. May > be I missed some points here. If you have patches which use/depend on it, then it's not so independent, right? > Let me know if I need to add this to back on series. In order to avoid any mishaps, that would be preferable, yes. -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog