From: Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>
To: Mario Limonciello <mario_limonciello@dell.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] Add support for deep sleep control.
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2016 09:32:08 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160202173208.GC1779@malice.jf.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1454380131-24662-5-git-send-email-mario_limonciello@dell.com>
On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 08:28:50PM -0600, Mario Limonciello wrote:
> This allows configuration the system for wakeup with a controller.
Hrm, I'm happy to clean up English grammar in commit messages... but I'm
struggling with the intent of the above... Is this correct:
Allow for user configuration, via sysfs, for wakeup with a controller.
If so, great - but also, what do we mean by "with a controller" ?
> The feature requires hardware architectural modifications and can
> not be supported on on existing systems.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario_limonciello@dell.com>
> ---
> drivers/platform/x86/alienware-wmi.c | 100 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 100 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/alienware-wmi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/alienware-wmi.c
> index e6f6322..f5ebcae 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/alienware-wmi.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/alienware-wmi.c
> @@ -34,6 +34,8 @@
> #define WMAX_METHOD_ZONE_CONTROL 0x4
> #define WMAX_METHOD_HDMI_CABLE 0x5
> #define WMAX_METHOD_AMPLIFIER_CABLE 0x6
> +#define WMAX_METHOD_DEEP_SLEEP_CONTROL 0x0B
> +#define WMAX_METHOD_DEEP_SLEEP_STATUS 0x0C
>
> MODULE_AUTHOR("Mario Limonciello <mario_limonciello@dell.com>");
> MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Alienware special feature control");
> @@ -62,6 +64,7 @@ struct quirk_entry {
> u8 num_zones;
> u8 hdmi_mux;
> u8 amplifier;
> + u8 deepslp;
> };
>
> static struct quirk_entry *quirks;
> @@ -70,24 +73,28 @@ static struct quirk_entry quirk_unknown = {
> .num_zones = 2,
> .hdmi_mux = 0,
> .amplifier = 0,
> + .deepslp = 0,
> };
>
> static struct quirk_entry quirk_x51_r1_r2 = {
> .num_zones = 3,
> .hdmi_mux = 0,
> .amplifier = 0,
> + .deepslp = 0,
> };
>
> static struct quirk_entry quirk_x51_r3 = {
> .num_zones = 4,
> .hdmi_mux = 0,
> .amplifier = 1,
> + .deepslp = 0,
> };
>
> static struct quirk_entry quirk_asm100 = {
> .num_zones = 2,
> .hdmi_mux = 1,
> .amplifier = 0,
> + .deepslp = 0,
> };
>
> static int __init dmi_matched(const struct dmi_system_id *dmi)
> @@ -650,6 +657,92 @@ error_create_amplifier:
> return ret;
> }
>
> +/* Deep Sleep Control support
> + * - Modifies BIOS setting for deep sleep control allowing extra wakeup events
> +*/
> +static ssize_t show_deepsleep_status(struct device *dev,
> + struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> +{
> + acpi_status status;
> + u32 out_data;
> + struct wmax_basic_args in_args = {
> + .arg = 0,
> + };
> + status =
> + alienware_wmax_command(&in_args, WMAX_METHOD_DEEP_SLEEP_STATUS,
> + (u32 *) &out_data);
> + if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status)) {
> + if (out_data == 0)
> + return scnprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE,
> + "[disabled] s5 s5_s4\n");
> + else if (out_data == 1)
> + return scnprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE,
> + "disabled [s5] s5_s4\n");
> + else if (out_data == 2)
> + return scnprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE,
> + "disabled s5 [s5_s4]\n");
> + }
> + pr_err("alienware-wmi: unknown deep sleep status: %d\n", status);
> + return scnprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "disabled s5 s5_s4 [unknown]\n");
> +}
> +
> +static ssize_t toggle_deepsleep(struct device *dev,
> + struct device_attribute *attr,
> + const char *buf, size_t count)
> +{
> + acpi_status status;
> + struct wmax_basic_args args;
> +
> + if (strcmp(buf, "disabled\n") == 0)
> + args.arg = 0;
> + else if (strcmp(buf, "s5\n") == 0)
> + args.arg = 1;
> + else
> + args.arg = 2;
> + pr_debug("alienware-wmi: setting deep sleep to %d : %s", args.arg, buf);
> +
> + status =
> + alienware_wmax_command(&args, WMAX_METHOD_DEEP_SLEEP_CONTROL, NULL);
Prefer to wrap the arguments:
status = alienware_wmax_command(&args, WMAX_METHOD_DEEP_SLEEP_CONTROL,
NULL);
> +
> + if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
> + pr_err
> + ("alienware-wmi: deep sleep control failed: results: %u\n",
Here, I don't consider the above to be "breakable" in terms of line wrapping.
pr_err("alienware-wmi: deep sleep control failed: results: %u\n",
Please.
> + status);
> + return count;
> +}
> +
> +static DEVICE_ATTR(deepsleep, S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR, show_deepsleep_status, toggle_deepsleep);
> +
> +static struct attribute *deepsleep_attrs[] = {
> + &dev_attr_deepsleep.attr,
> + NULL,
> +};
> +
> +static struct attribute_group deepsleep_attribute_group = {
> + .name = "deepsleep",
> + .attrs = deepsleep_attrs,
> +};
> +
> +static void remove_deepsleep(struct platform_device *dev)
> +{
> + if (quirks->deepslp > 0)
> + sysfs_remove_group(&dev->dev.kobj, &deepsleep_attribute_group);
> +}
> +
> +static int create_deepsleep(struct platform_device *dev)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = sysfs_create_group(&dev->dev.kobj, &deepsleep_attribute_group);
> + if (ret)
> + goto error_create_deepsleep;
> + return 0;
> +
> +error_create_deepsleep:
> + remove_deepsleep(dev);
> + return ret;
As i the previous patch, this goto label is unnecessary.
> +}
> +
> static int __init alienware_wmi_init(void)
> {
> int ret;
> @@ -691,6 +784,12 @@ static int __init alienware_wmi_init(void)
> goto fail_prep_amplifier;
> }
>
> + if (quirks->deepslp > 0) {
> + ret = create_deepsleep(platform_device);
> + if (ret)
> + goto fail_prep_deepsleep;
> + }
> +
> ret = alienware_zone_init(platform_device);
> if (ret)
> goto fail_prep_zones;
> @@ -699,6 +798,7 @@ static int __init alienware_wmi_init(void)
>
> fail_prep_zones:
> alienware_zone_exit(platform_device);
> +fail_prep_deepsleep:
> fail_prep_amplifier:
> fail_prep_hdmi:
> platform_device_del(platform_device);
> --
> 1.9.1
>
>
--
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-02 17:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-02 2:28 [PATCH v2 0/5] alienware-wmi new platform and feature support Mario Limonciello
2016-02-02 2:28 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] Clean up whitespace for ASM100 platform Mario Limonciello
2016-02-02 2:28 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] Add support for new platform: X51-R3 Mario Limonciello
2016-02-02 2:28 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] Add initial support for alienware graphics amplifier Mario Limonciello
2016-02-02 17:24 ` Darren Hart
2016-02-02 18:06 ` Mario Limonciello
2016-02-02 2:28 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] Add support for deep sleep control Mario Limonciello
2016-02-02 17:32 ` Darren Hart [this message]
2016-02-02 18:09 ` Mario Limonciello
2016-02-02 20:47 ` Darren Hart
2016-02-02 2:28 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] Add support for two new systems: ASM200 and ASM201 Mario Limonciello
2016-02-02 17:38 ` Darren Hart
2016-02-02 17:39 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] alienware-wmi new platform and feature support Darren Hart
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160202173208.GC1779@malice.jf.intel.com \
--to=dvhart@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mario_limonciello@dell.com \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox