From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1755491AbcBCOCE (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 3 Feb 2016 09:02:04 -0500
Received: from mail-pa0-f45.google.com ([209.85.220.45]:36710 "EHLO
	mail-pa0-f45.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1752468AbcBCOCB (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 3 Feb 2016 09:02:01 -0500
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2016 19:31:57 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc: Shilpasri G Bhat <shilpa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
        "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>, pc@us.ibm.com,
        anton@samba.org, ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com, shreyas@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
        bsingharora@gmail.com, mpe@ellerman.id.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/6] cpufreq: powernv: Redesign the presentation of
 throttle notification and solve bug-fixes in the driver
Message-ID: <20160203140157.GF3469@vireshk>
References: <1454442102-1229-1-git-send-email-shilpa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
 <CAJZ5v0g28Px=KPa3uCW86w+u35CKkHd7rCrbTfxDjKHmcBuOEQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAJZ5v0g28Px=KPa3uCW86w+u35CKkHd7rCrbTfxDjKHmcBuOEQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On 03-02-16, 14:40, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> It looks like patches [1-5/6] are not objectionable and I can apply
> them without the last one if you want me to.

Looks fine to me.

-- 
viresh