From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756356AbcBDK0u (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Feb 2016 05:26:50 -0500 Received: from mail-wm0-f47.google.com ([74.125.82.47]:35185 "EHLO mail-wm0-f47.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756248AbcBDK0r (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Feb 2016 05:26:47 -0500 Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2016 11:26:43 +0100 From: "Steinar H. Gunderson" To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Bj=F8rn?= Mork Cc: Felipe Balbi , Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stern@rowland.harvard.edu Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Add support for usbfs zerocopy. Message-ID: <20160204102643.GA88749@imap.gmail.com> References: <20160106001143.GA1171@kroah.com> <20160124211208.GA8696@kroah.com> <20160125080352.GA30907@imap.gmail.com> <20160203212317.GA7506@kroah.com> <20160203220911.GA1675@imap.gmail.com> <878u31phih.fsf@ti.com> <20160203234035.GA3533@imap.gmail.com> <87lh704w5l.fsf@nemi.mork.no> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <87lh704w5l.fsf@nemi.mork.no> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 11:17:26AM +0100, Bjørn Mork wrote: > Then use Mutt to reply, but include the patch inline instead of > attaching it. I believe this is discussed in the Mutt section of > Documentation/email-clients.txt Thanks; if that works (even though it changes the “From” line and such) that's a good solution. It doesn't work for series of multiple patches, but I can certainly live with that. /* Steinar */ -- Software Engineer, Google Switzerland