From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754941AbcBGWEy (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Feb 2016 17:04:54 -0500 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:55008 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754208AbcBGWEV (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Feb 2016 17:04:21 -0500 Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2016 14:04:21 -0800 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Sudip Mukherjee Cc: Benjamin Romer , David Kershner , devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, sparmaintainer@unisys.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Dan Carpenter Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] staging: unisys: use common return path Message-ID: <20160207220421.GB28175@kroah.com> References: <1448967153-14537-1-git-send-email-sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1448967153-14537-1-git-send-email-sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 04:22:33PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > The success path and the error path both are first doing > spin_unlock_irqrestore() before returning. Use that in the common path > and return the success/error value. > > Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee > --- > > v2: changed label name > > It is dependent on the patch series sent by Benjamin (Nov 30th). Which didn't get applied, so can you resend this after that does get accepted? thanks, greg k-h