From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@gmail.com>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] debugfs: prevent access to removed files' private data
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 08:17:29 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160208161729.GA9814@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <877fifmegw.fsf@gmail.com>
On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 04:03:27PM +0100, Nicolai Stange wrote:
> Upon return of debugfs_remove()/debugfs_remove_recursive(), it might
> still be attempted to access associated private file data through
> previously opened struct file objects. If that data has been freed by
> the caller of debugfs_remove*() in the meanwhile, the reading/writing
> process would either encounter a fault or, if the memory address in
> question has been reassigned again, unrelated data structures could get
> overwritten.
>
> However, since debugfs files are seldomly removed, usually from module
> exit handlers only, the impact is very low.
>
> Since debugfs_remove() and debugfs_remove_recursive() are already
> waiting for a SRCU grace period before returning to their callers,
> enclosing the access to private file data from ->read() and ->write()
> within a SRCU read-side critical section does the trick:
> - Introduce the debugfs_file_use_data_start() and
> debugfs_file_use_data_finish() helpers which just enter and leave
> a SRCU read-side critical section. The former also reports whether the
> file is still alive, that is if d_delete() has _not_ been called on
> the corresponding dentry.
> - Introduce the DEFINE_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE() macro which is completely
> equivalent to the DEFINE_SIMPLE_ATTRIBUTE() macro except that
> ->read() and ->write are set to SRCU protecting wrappers around the
> original simple_read() and simple_write() helpers.
> - Use that DEFINE_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE() macro for all debugfs_create_*()
> attribute creation variants where appropriate.
> - Manually introduce SRCU protection to the debugfs-predefined readers
> and writers not covered by the above DEFINE_SIMPLE_ATTRIBUTE()->
> DEFINE_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE() replacement.
>
> Finally, it should be worth to note that in the vast majority of cases
> where debugfs users are handing in a "custom" struct file_operations
> object to debugfs_create_file(), an attribute's associated data's
> lifetime is bound to the one of the containing module and thus,
> taking a reference on ->owner during file opening acts as a proxy here.
> There is no need to do a mass replace of DEFINE_SIMPLE_ATTRIBUTE() to
> DEFINE_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE() outside of debugfs.
>
> OTOH, new users of debugfs are encouraged to prefer the
> DEFINE_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE() macro over DEFINE_SIMPLE_ATTRIBUTE() and it,
> as well as the needed read/write wrappers are made available globally.
> For new users implementing their own readers and writers, the lifetime
> management helpers debugfs_file_use_data_start() and
> debugfs_file_use_data_finish() are exported.
Nice job. One more request... :)
Can you show how you would convert a subsystem to use these new
macros/calls to give a solid example of it in use outside of the debugfs
core?
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-08 16:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-08 15:00 [PATCH v2 0/2] fix debugfs file removal races Nicolai Stange
2016-02-08 15:02 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] debugfs: prevent access to possibly dead file_operations at file open Nicolai Stange
2016-02-08 15:03 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] debugfs: prevent access to removed files' private data Nicolai Stange
2016-02-08 16:17 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2016-02-08 17:14 ` Nicolai Stange
2016-02-08 19:16 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2016-02-08 20:00 ` Nicolai Stange
2016-02-08 20:08 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2016-02-09 22:03 ` Nicolai Stange
2016-02-09 22:24 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160208161729.GA9814@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=jack@suse.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicstange@gmail.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox