From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932431AbcBIKYO (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Feb 2016 05:24:14 -0500 Received: from mail-wm0-f48.google.com ([74.125.82.48]:36291 "EHLO mail-wm0-f48.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932397AbcBIKYI (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Feb 2016 05:24:08 -0500 Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 10:24:03 +0000 From: Lee Jones To: "Andrew F. Davis" Cc: Mark Brown , Rob Herring , Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , Linus Walleij , Alexandre Courbot , Samuel Ortiz , Liam Girdwood , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/5] mfd: tps65912: Driver rewrite with DT support Message-ID: <20160209102403.GB24522@x1> References: <1453736627-2634-1-git-send-email-afd@ti.com> <20160128064149.GM3368@x1> <20160128114026.GB6078@sirena.org.uk> <20160128120423.GP3368@x1> <20160128124525.GF6078@sirena.org.uk> <20160128133049.GQ3368@x1> <56B0C559.7060204@ti.com> <56B61D84.9000709@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <56B61D84.9000709@ti.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 06 Feb 2016, Andrew F. Davis wrote: > On 02/02/2016 09:03 AM, Andrew F. Davis wrote: > >On 01/28/2016 07:30 AM, Lee Jones wrote: > >>On Thu, 28 Jan 2016, Mark Brown wrote: > >> > >>>On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 12:04:23PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote: > >>>>On Thu, 28 Jan 2016, Mark Brown wrote: > >>> > >>>>>Please be more specific? What is it that you are looking for beyond the > >>>>>review I already did for the regulator driver? > >>> > >>>>Patch 2. > >>> > >>>I reviewed that *ages* ago. > >> > >>Link or it didn't happen. ;) > >> > > > >Might be best to take his ack for the new regulator driver > >as approval to remove the old one. :) > > If not, is there anything I can do to help keep this from getting > delayed another cycle? I don't normally like to assume Acks, but as Mark has been so insistent that he's already conducted the review, I'm happy to take that as one. If there is any fall-out over this, I will be pointing everyone back to this thread, Leave it with me. This will go in [*]. [*] When I dig myself back out of the pile of emails I have in my inbox presently. -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog