From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751101AbcBLGCz (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Feb 2016 01:02:55 -0500 Received: from mail-pa0-f46.google.com ([209.85.220.46]:34628 "EHLO mail-pa0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750714AbcBLGCx (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Feb 2016 01:02:53 -0500 Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2016 11:32:42 +0530 From: Sudip Mukherjee To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 12 Message-ID: <20160212060241.GA1390@sudip-pc> References: <20160212162035.1e0260cd@canb.auug.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160212162035.1e0260cd@canb.auug.org.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 04:20:35PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20160211: since last few days with gcc-4.6.3, x86_64 and i386 defconfig and allmodconfig builds are failing with the error: "arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h:26:18: error: memory input 0 is not directly addressable" But with gcc-4.8.2 and later it builds fine. Should I try to bisect and find the problem or its not worth for gcc-4.6.3 ? regards sudip