linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com>
To: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Stefan Berger <stefanb@us.ibm.com>,
	Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] tpm: Hold the kref during tpm_chip_find_get
Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2016 23:50:08 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160214065008.GC9551@obsidianresearch.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160214045512.GA7777@intel.com>

On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 06:55:12AM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 05:04:29PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > This was missed during the struct device conversion, we
> > need to hold a kref on the chip to make sure it isn't freed.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com>
> 
> I'm bit confused about this patch. What is the regression if this
> needs

The patch is simply totally broken, the placement of the get_device is
wrong:

> > @@ -53,6 +53,8 @@ struct tpm_chip *tpm_chip_find_get(int chip_num)
> >  			chip = pos;
> >  			break;
> >  		}
> > +
> > +		get_device(&chip->dev);

It needs to be moved up two lines before the break, into the if
statement.

As for the urgency - today the tpm core relies on module locking to
try and prevent tpm_chip_unregister from racing with stuff like the
above. That is totally broken in modern kernels, but it is what the
core tries to do. Within that framework the get/put are not needed
because of the module locking.

The only time these additional get/put do anything is when we are
racing with tpm_unregister, but if we are racing with unregister then
there are much bigger problems and things will crash anyhow.

So, this patch is just a tiny step.

The revised version of this patch with the rw_sem attempts to address
the complete race.

Jason

  reply	other threads:[~2016-02-14  6:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-13  0:04 [PATCH 0/3] Various struct device cleanups Jason Gunthorpe
2016-02-13  0:04 ` [PATCH 1/3] tpm: Hold the kref during tpm_chip_find_get Jason Gunthorpe
2016-02-13 10:08   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2016-02-13 15:45     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2016-02-14  4:55   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2016-02-14  6:50     ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2016-02-14  8:02       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2016-02-13  0:04 ` [PATCH 2/3] tpm: Get rid of chip->pdev Jason Gunthorpe
     [not found]   ` <201602130037.u1D0bDEN029756@d01av04.pok.ibm.com>
2016-02-13  1:11     ` Jason Gunthorpe
     [not found]       ` <201602130128.u1D1S2Xn006955@d01av05.pok.ibm.com>
2016-02-13  2:00         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2016-02-13  3:33         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2016-02-14  5:24           ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2016-02-14  6:57             ` Jason Gunthorpe
2016-02-14  8:03               ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2016-02-13 15:39   ` [tpmdd-devel] " Stefan Berger
2016-02-14  7:06     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2016-02-14  5:13   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2016-02-13  0:04 ` [PATCH 3/3] tpm: Get rid of devname Jason Gunthorpe
2016-02-13  1:01   ` kbuild test robot
2016-02-13  1:13     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2016-02-14  5:16   ` Jarkko Sakkinen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160214065008.GC9551@obsidianresearch.com \
    --to=jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com \
    --cc=jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterhuewe@gmx.de \
    --cc=stefanb@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).