From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@hpe.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>, Jeff Layton <jlayton@poochiereds.net>,
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>,
Scott J Norton <scott.norton@hp.com>,
Douglas Hatch <doug.hatch@hp.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] lib/percpu-list: Per-cpu list with associated per-cpu locks
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 22:10:02 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160217111002.GQ14668@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160217110040.GB6357@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 12:00:40PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 08:53:18PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > > +/**
> > > + * for_all_percpu_list_entries - iterate over all the per-cpu list with locking
> > > + * @pos: the type * to use as a loop cursor for the current .
> > > + * @next: an internal type * variable pointing to the next entry
> > > + * @pchead: an internal struct list * of percpu list head
> > > + * @pclock: an internal variable for the current per-cpu spinlock
> > > + * @head: the head of the per-cpu list
> > > + * @member: the name of the per-cpu list within the struct
> > > + */
> > > +#define for_all_percpu_list_entries(pos, next, pchead, pclock, head, member)\
> > > + { \
> > > + int cpu; \
> > > + for_each_possible_cpu (cpu) { \
> > > + typeof(*pos) *next; \
> > > + spinlock_t *pclock = per_cpu_ptr(&(head)->lock, cpu); \
> > > + struct list_head *pchead = &per_cpu_ptr(head, cpu)->list;\
> > > + spin_lock(pclock); \
> > > + list_for_each_entry_safe(pos, next, pchead, member.list)
> > > +
> > > +#define end_all_percpu_list_entries(pclock) spin_unlock(pclock); } }
> >
> > This is a bit of a landmine
>
> Yeah, that is pretty terrible. Maybe a visitor interface is advisable?
>
> visit_percpu_list_entries(struct percpu_list *head, void (*visitor)(struct list_head *pos, void *data), void *data)
> {
> int cpu;
>
> for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> spinlock_t *lock = per_cpu_ptr(&head->lock, cpu);
> struct list_head *head = per_cpu_ptr(&head->list, cpu);
> struct list_head *pos, *tmp;
>
> spin_lock(lock);
> for (pos = head->next, tmp = pos->next; pos != head; pos = tmp)
> visitor(pos, data);
I thought about this - it's the same problem as the list_lru walking
functions. That is, the visitor has to be able to drop the list lock
to do blocking operations, so the lock has to be passed to the
visitor/internal loop context somehow, and the way the callers can
use it need to be documented.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-17 11:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-17 1:31 [RFC PATCH 0/2] vfs: Use per-cpu list for SB's s_inodes list Waiman Long
2016-02-17 1:31 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] lib/percpu-list: Per-cpu list with associated per-cpu locks Waiman Long
2016-02-17 9:53 ` Dave Chinner
2016-02-17 11:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-17 11:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-17 16:16 ` Waiman Long
2016-02-17 16:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-17 16:27 ` Christoph Lameter
2016-02-17 17:12 ` Waiman Long
2016-02-17 17:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-17 17:41 ` Waiman Long
2016-02-17 18:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-17 18:45 ` Waiman Long
2016-02-17 19:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-17 11:10 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2016-02-17 11:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-17 11:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-17 15:56 ` Waiman Long
2016-02-17 16:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-17 15:13 ` Christoph Lameter
2016-02-17 1:31 ` [RRC PATCH 2/2] vfs: Use per-cpu list for superblock's inode list Waiman Long
2016-02-17 7:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-02-17 15:40 ` Waiman Long
2016-02-17 10:37 ` Dave Chinner
2016-02-17 16:08 ` Waiman Long
2016-02-18 23:58 ` [RFC PATCH 0/2] vfs: Use per-cpu list for SB's s_inodes list Dave Chinner
2016-02-19 21:04 ` Long, Wai Man
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160217111002.GQ14668@dastard \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=Waiman.Long@hpe.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
--cc=doug.hatch@hp.com \
--cc=jack@suse.com \
--cc=jlayton@poochiereds.net \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=scott.norton@hp.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox