From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965710AbcBQWQn (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Feb 2016 17:16:43 -0500 Received: from one.firstfloor.org ([193.170.194.197]:42600 "EHLO one.firstfloor.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965454AbcBQWQm (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Feb 2016 17:16:42 -0500 Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 23:16:40 +0100 From: Andi Kleen To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Andi Kleen , Stephane Eranian , LKML , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Harish Chegondi , Kan Liang , Andi Kleen Subject: Re: [patch 07/11] x86/perf/uncore: Track packages not per cpu data Message-ID: <20160217221640.GD5083@two.firstfloor.org> References: <20160217132903.767990400@linutronix.de> <20160217133932.279611021@linutronix.de> <878u2j9gjr.fsf@tassilo.jf.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Do you have any data to back that up or is that just "believe" ? I've seen systems with discontiguous apic ids before. It is obvious if you consider setups with node hotplug. BTW reading this thread you don't seem interested in any code review feedback, attacking everyone, not bothering to look up data sheets, not understanding the hardware you're changing the driver for, etc. Why do you even bother to post the patches? -Andi