From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1426289AbcBRMTP (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Feb 2016 07:19:15 -0500 Received: from mail-wm0-f45.google.com ([74.125.82.45]:36750 "EHLO mail-wm0-f45.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1424180AbcBRMTN (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Feb 2016 07:19:13 -0500 Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 14:19:09 +0200 From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" To: Dave Hansen Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" , Hugh Dickins , Andrea Arcangeli , Andrew Morton , Vlastimil Babka , Christoph Lameter , Naoya Horiguchi , Jerome Marchand , Yang Shi , Sasha Levin , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 13/28] thp: support file pages in zap_huge_pmd() Message-ID: <20160218121909.GA28184@node.shutemov.name> References: <1455200516-132137-1-git-send-email-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> <1455200516-132137-14-git-send-email-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> <56BE2581.6070901@intel.com> <20160216100023.GC46557@black.fi.intel.com> <56C340EE.1060506@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <56C340EE.1060506@intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23.1 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 07:31:58AM -0800, Dave Hansen wrote: > On 02/16/2016 02:00 AM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 10:33:37AM -0800, Dave Hansen wrote: > >> On 02/11/2016 06:21 AM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > >>> For file pages we don't deposit page table on mapping: no need to > >>> withdraw it. > >> > >> I thought the deposit thing was to guarantee we could always do a PMD > >> split. It still seems like if you wanted to split a huge-tmpfs page, > >> you'd need to first split the PMD which might need the deposited one. > >> > >> Why not? > > > > For file thp, split_huge_pmd() is implemented by clearing out the pmd: we > > can setup and fill pte table later. Therefore no need to deposit page > > table -- we would not use it. DAX does the same. > > Ahh... Do we just never split in any fault contexts, or do we just > retry the fault? In fault contexts we would just continue fault handling as if we had pmd_none(). -- Kirill A. Shutemov