From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1426386AbcBRNgu (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Thu, 18 Feb 2016 08:36:50 -0500
Received: from mail.passe0815.de ([188.40.49.9]:59122 "EHLO mail.passe0815.de"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1425276AbcBRNgs (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 18 Feb 2016 08:36:48 -0500
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 14:36:44 +0100
From: Linus =?utf-8?Q?L=C3=BCssing?= <linus.luessing@c0d3.blue>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
        bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        =?utf-8?B?w4FsdmFybyBGZXJuw6FuZGV6?= Rojas <noltari@gmail.com>,
        Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: fix bridge multicast packet checksum validation
Message-ID: <20160218133644.GL3010@otheros>
References: <1455502026-23144-1-git-send-email-linus.luessing@c0d3.blue>
 <20160218125134.GA20283@sesse.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <20160218125134.GA20283@sesse.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
X-GPG-Mailgate: Not encrypted, public key not found
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 01:51:34PM +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 03:07:06AM +0100, Linus Lüssing wrote:
> > Steinar, can you check whether this fixes the bridge issues you reported on
> > bugzilla #99081? Not quite sure whether it is the same as yours as you
> > do not seem to have any such call traces.
> 
> It doesn't immediately sound like the same problem; why would promisc change
> anything if the problem is the checksumming?

The mdb you provided in the bugzilla ticket misses reports, so it
was unable to parse reports. Which could point to a checksumming
problem.

Enabling promisc probably did not fix the parsing for you, but instead
promisc forces to forward packets upstream on your interface independent
of the mdb. I would assume that even with promisc, your output
from "bridge mdb show" looks rather empty. Can you check?

> 
> I don't have any reboots scheduled for this machine right now, but I'll see
> what I can do wrt. testing.

Thanks :).