From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1754532AbcBVLDi (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Mon, 22 Feb 2016 06:03:38 -0500
Received: from mail-wm0-f42.google.com ([74.125.82.42]:37911 "EHLO
	mail-wm0-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751781AbcBVLDf (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 22 Feb 2016 06:03:35 -0500
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 12:03:28 +0100
From: luca abeni <luca.abeni@unitn.it>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org,
        wanpeng.li@hotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] sched/deadline: add per rq tracking of admitted
 bandwidth
Message-ID: <20160222120328.0107f20e@utopia>
In-Reply-To: <20160219155306.52ea1c37@utopia>
References: <1454935531-7541-1-git-send-email-juri.lelli@arm.com>
	<1454935531-7541-2-git-send-email-juri.lelli@arm.com>
	<20160210113258.GX11415@e106622-lin>
	<20160210124334.0c44e3ec@utopia>
	<20160210115812.GZ11415@e106622-lin>
	<20160219144347.22c6388d@utopia>
	<20160219092008.70d55792@gandalf.local.home>
	<20160219155306.52ea1c37@utopia>
Organization: university of trento
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.12.0 (GTK+ 2.24.28; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Fri, 19 Feb 2016 15:53:06 +0100
luca abeni <luca.abeni@unitn.it> wrote:
[...]
> > Please send the patches in a patch series. It is very hard to review
> > patches that are attachments. And our scripts are made to apply
> > patches from mailing lists. Having attachments just makes the job
> > harder.
> 
> Sorry about that; I was in hurry, and I tried to do the quickest
> thing... I'll resend the patches in a more appropriate way on Monday.

Ok; I just re-sent the patches with git sent-email. Hopefully, I
managed to send them as a reply to Juri's original patch, so that the
context of the discussion is not lost.

I just realized that the subjects of the emails say "[*/4]" instead of
"[*/3]" because of a stupid error of mine; I hope this is not a problem
(the patches are sent only for discussion). If this is a problem, I can
resend, of course.


			Thanks (and sorry for the mess),
				Luca