From: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>,
Sai Praneeth Prakhya <sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com>,
"Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/10] x86/xsaves: Fix init_fpstate.header.xcomp_bv
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 12:42:57 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160222204256.GB4140@test-lenovo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56CB67C6.3050707@linux.intel.com>
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 11:55:50AM -0800, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 02/22/2016 10:59 AM, Yu-cheng Yu wrote:
> > This actually does not apply to XSAVES as XSAVES uses optimization. After
> > init, all components are in INIT and not MODIFIED state and will not be
> > saved. There is no need of setting xcomp_bv except for bit 63 to indicate
> > a compacted format.
>
> I look at it this way: xcomp_bv tells you the format of the buffer
> xstate_bv tells you which components of the buffer are valid (not in
> init state).
>
> As it stands, every kernel xcomp_bv value should be identical, since the
> kernel buffer is always in the same state and XSAVES is always called
> with the same Requested Feature BitMap (RFBM).
>
> While I don't think this patch _hurts_ anything, I think it might be a
> bit confusing. Wouldn't it just be easier if *EVERY* xcomp_bv value was
> the same?
Agree. This patch can be skipped if it turns out not needed.
--Yu-cheng
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-22 20:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-22 18:59 [PATCH 07/10] x86/xsaves: Fix init_fpstate.header.xcomp_bv Yu-cheng Yu
2016-02-22 19:55 ` Dave Hansen
2016-02-22 20:42 ` Yu-cheng Yu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160222204256.GB4140@test-lenovo \
--to=yu-cheng.yu@intel.com \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=ravi.v.shankar@intel.com \
--cc=sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox