From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1752738AbcBWOFH (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Tue, 23 Feb 2016 09:05:07 -0500
Received: from outbound-smtp05.blacknight.com ([81.17.249.38]:44883 "EHLO
	outbound-smtp05.blacknight.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752254AbcBWOFF (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 23 Feb 2016 09:05:05 -0500
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 14:04:59 +0000
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
To: Doug Smythies <dsmythies@telus.net>
Cc: "'Rafael J. Wysocki'" <rafael@kernel.org>,
        "'Rafael Wysocki'" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
        "'Ingo Molnar'" <mingo@kernel.org>,
        "'Peter Zijlstra'" <peterz@infradead.org>,
        "'Matt Fleming'" <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>,
        "'Mike Galbraith'" <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>,
        "'Linux-PM'" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
        "'LKML'" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "'Srinivas Pandruvada'" <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] intel_pstate: Increase hold-off time before busyness
 is scaled
Message-ID: <20160223140459.GA2854@techsingularity.net>
References: <1455793883-14214-1-git-send-email-mgorman@techsingularity.net>
 <CAJZ5v0hSLJRkOKQ0UvJsSs0o-NuHiE+gOnC+f0q8vQtciABP2Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <001101d16a90$a7a26e10$f6e74a30$@net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <001101d16a90$a7a26e10$f6e74a30$@net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 01:09:26PM -0800, Doug Smythies wrote:
> >> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> >> @@ -999,7 +999,7 @@ static inline int32_t get_target_pstate_use_performance(struct cpudata *cpu)
> >>         sample_time = pid_params.sample_rate_ms  * USEC_PER_MSEC;
> >>         duration_us = ktime_us_delta(cpu->sample.time,
> >>                                      cpu->last_sample_time);
> >> -       if (duration_us > sample_time * 3) {
> >> +       if (duration_us > sample_time * 12) {
> >>                 sample_ratio = div_fp(int_tofp(sample_time),
> >>                                       int_tofp(duration_us));
> >>                 core_busy = mul_fp(core_busy, sample_ratio);
> >> --
> 
> The immediately preceding comment needs to be changed also.
> Note that with duration related scaling only coming in at such a high
> ratio it might be worth saving the divide and just setting it to 0.
> 

I tried this and FWIW, the performance is generally comparable as is the
power usage as reported by turbostat. On occasion, depending on the
machine, the system CPU usage is noticably lower.

-- 
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs