From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753059AbcBWO1Z (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Feb 2016 09:27:25 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.136]:43421 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752376AbcBWO1W (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Feb 2016 09:27:22 -0500 Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 11:27:17 -0300 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Josh Poimboeuf , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, live-patching@vger.kernel.org, Michal Marek , Peter Zijlstra , Andy Lutomirski , Borislav Petkov , Linus Torvalds , Andi Kleen , Pedro Alves , Namhyung Kim , Bernd Petrovitsch , Chris J Arges , Andrew Morton , Jiri Slaby , David Vrabel , Borislav Petkov , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , Boris Ostrovsky , Jeremy Fitzhardinge , Chris Wright , Alok Kataria , Rusty Russell , Herbert Xu , "David S. Miller" , Pavel Machek , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Len Brown , Matt Fleming , Alexei Starovoitov , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli , Anil S Keshavamurthy , Masami Hiramatsu , Gleb Natapov , Paolo Bonzini , kvm@vger.kernel.org, Wim Van Sebroeck , Guenter Roeck , linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, Waiman Long Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/33] Compile-time stack metadata validation Message-ID: <20160223142717.GA3607@kernel.org> References: <20160223081406.GA606@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160223081406.GA606@gmail.com> X-Url: http://acmel.wordpress.com User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Em Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 09:14:06AM +0100, Ingo Molnar escreveu: > The fact that 'stacktool' already checks about assembly details like __ex_table[] > shows that my review feedback early iterations of this series, that the > 'stacktool' name is too specific, was correct. > > We really need to rename it before it gets upstream and the situation gets worse. > __ex_table[] has obviously nothing to do with the 'stack layout' of binaries. > > Another suitable name would be 'asmtool' or 'objtool'. For example the following > would naturally express what it does: > > objtool check kernel/built-in.o > > the name expresses that the tool checks object files, independently of the > existing toolchain. Its primary purpose right now is the checking of stack layout > details, but the tool is not limited to that at all. Removing 'tool' from the tool name would be nice too :-) Making it easily googlable would be good too, lotsa people complain about 'perf' being too vague, see for a quick laugher: http://www.brendangregg.com/perf.html ``Searching for just "perf" finds sites on the police, petroleum, weed control, and a T-shirt. This is not an official perf page, for either perf_events or the T-shirt.'' The T-shirt: http://www.brendangregg.com/perf_events/omg-so-perf.jpg Maybe we should ask Linus to come with some other nice, short, searchable, funny name like 'git'? 'chob' as in 'check object'? - Arnaldo