From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1754777AbcBWTg7 (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Tue, 23 Feb 2016 14:36:59 -0500
Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.136]:40948 "EHLO mail.kernel.org"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751374AbcBWTg5 (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 23 Feb 2016 14:36:57 -0500
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 13:36:51 -0600
From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To: David Daney <ddaney.cavm@gmail.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>,
        Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
        Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
        Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
        Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org,
        Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gkulkarni@caviumnetworks.com>,
        Robert Richter <rrichter@cavium.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 08/10] dt, numa: Add NUMA dt binding implementation.
Message-ID: <20160223193651.GA8491@rob-hp-laptop>
References: <1455930799-5371-1-git-send-email-ddaney.cavm@gmail.com>
 <1455930799-5371-9-git-send-email-ddaney.cavm@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1455930799-5371-9-git-send-email-ddaney.cavm@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 05:13:17PM -0800, David Daney wrote:
> From: Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gkulkarni@caviumnetworks.com>
> 
> ADD device tree node parsing for NUMA topology using device
> "numa-node-id" property distance-map.

I still want an adequate explanation why NUMA setup cannot be done with 
an unflattened tree. PowerPC manages to do that and should have a 
similar init flow being memblock based, so I would expect arm64 can too.

Rob