From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1753348AbcBXOex (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 24 Feb 2016 09:34:53 -0500
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:51364 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1750931AbcBXOew (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 24 Feb 2016 09:34:52 -0500
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 15:34:44 +0100
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
        Brendan Gregg <brendan.d.gregg@gmail.com>,
        Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
        Cody P Schafer <dev@codyps.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>, He Kuang <hekuang@huawei.com>,
        =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=E9r=E9mie?= Galarneau 
	<jeremie.galarneau@efficios.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Kirill Smelkov <kirr@nexedi.com>,
        Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, pi3orama@163.com,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 22/48] perf tools: Add perf_data_file__switch() helper
Message-ID: <20160224143444.GF27710@krava.redhat.com>
References: <1456132275-98875-1-git-send-email-wangnan0@huawei.com>
 <1456132275-98875-23-git-send-email-wangnan0@huawei.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1456132275-98875-23-git-send-email-wangnan0@huawei.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 09:10:49AM +0000, Wang Nan wrote:
> perf_data_file__switch() closes current output file, renames it, then
> open a new one to continue record. It will be used by perf record
> to split output into multiple perf.data files.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: He Kuang <hekuang@huawei.com>
> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
> Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
> Cc: Zefan Li <lizefan@huawei.com>
> Cc: pi3orama@163.com
> ---
>  tools/perf/util/data.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  tools/perf/util/data.h | 11 ++++++++++-
>  2 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/data.c b/tools/perf/util/data.c
> index 1921942..bfded6a 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/data.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/data.c
> @@ -136,3 +136,39 @@ ssize_t perf_data_file__write(struct perf_data_file *file,
>  {
>  	return writen(file->fd, buf, size);
>  }
> +
> +int perf_data_file__switch(struct perf_data_file *file,
> +			   const char *postfix,
> +			   size_t pos, bool at_exit)
> +{
> +	char *new_filepath;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	if (check_pipe(file))
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	if (perf_data_file__is_read(file))
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	if (asprintf(&new_filepath, "%s.%s", file->path, postfix) < 0)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	rename(file->path, new_filepath);

should we check for rename's return value?

jirka