public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: lgirdwood@gmail.com, patches@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com,
	alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: arizona: Make logging of FLL calculations clearer
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 10:53:47 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160225015347.GV18327@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56CDEAD4.1050405@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 726 bytes --]

On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 05:39:32PM +0000, Richard Fitzgerald wrote:
> On 24/02/16 04:08, Mark Brown wrote:

> >I think that stuff was originally based on the way the datasheets quote
> >things:

> >>-	arizona_fll_dbg(fll, "FRATIO=%x(%d) OUTDIV=%x REFCLK_DIV=%x\n",
> >the hex(decimal) but there is certainly very familiar from some of
> >those.

> Indeed, and it was fine on the first codec. Now we've got various revisions
> of the FLL with some fields having different meanings, human error started
> to creep into interpreting the debug.

I'm not saying it's a bad idea to change it, just pointing out where
it's likely to have come from (and the fact that the way the datasheets
were writing this was always a bit weird).

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 473 bytes --]

      reply	other threads:[~2016-02-25  1:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-23 14:16 [PATCH] ASoC: arizona: Make logging of FLL calculations clearer Richard Fitzgerald
2016-02-24  4:08 ` Mark Brown
2016-02-24 17:39   ` Richard Fitzgerald
2016-02-25  1:53     ` Mark Brown [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160225015347.GV18327@sirena.org.uk \
    --to=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
    --cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=patches@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    --cc=rf@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox